1. The OSI tried to get a trademark for “open source” in their early days and failed.[1] They don’t own the term, and arguing fine distinctions like this does nothing but promote flame wars.[2]

2. The developer put a lot of effort into this and was generous enough to make this available for free with the source code open. Please be gracious, because belligerent feedback like this is what causes people to sometimes reconsider making software free or open source.[3]

3. You also falsely claim Patrick Wardle is aware of the issue and refuses to change it, even though he hasn’t commented on the issue you cited, at least as I write this.

[1] https://opensource.org/pressreleases/certified-open-source.p...

[2] cf. every discussion board or mailing list where issues like this have come up.

[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/73yznc/comment/do1...