If it quacks like a RDBMS…
snailinaturtleneck.com
snailinaturtleneck.com
Please don't submit a title like that next time.
The comment (which is what I linked directly to) came from the writer of the actual blog, who is one of the main developers for the Mongo DB PHP driver. http://www.snailinaturtleneck.com/blog/about/
So I would take it with far more than a pinch of salt.
Thank you, you seem to have corrected the title of your submission.
Still I'm not sure such thing is worth posting to HN at all. Little technical value, just spreading the information that somebody is not satisfied with something. This is what I call "emotion flush". Do we really care?
Please note I'm not attempting to bash specifically you but rather thinking of improving general quality of HN links.
But it seems like the claim made on http://www.mikealrogers.com/2010/07/mongodb-performance-dura... that with an in-memory version of Postgres "once you turn off the log and all the durability it’s neck and neck with MongoDB write performance" ... might not be so far off the mark.
I still like MongoDB though. During dev it's nice to not have to worry so much about schema, run ALTER, etc.
It's not a trade-off if there's no upside.