Ask HN: How do you document your knowhow, past projects and lessons?
Wondering what use HN community, if there is better way or tools for that.
Wondering what use HN community, if there is better way or tools for that.
Evernote's Search is much better than OneNote's (Windows' Search), searching seamlessly even inside attachments, but I absolutely hate the look of Evernote pages; just a personal thing. Could be something as simple as Tahoma vs. Calibri, but I think it's more than that...OneNote really looks good to my subjective eye. Plus I like the keyboard shortcuts.
For PDFs, get really good at whatever Reader you use w.r.t. annotation tools. I love PDF-Xchange Viewer for annotation (a Windows product).
OneNote is probably the closest thing that exists.
Other than that, I use Edge to write on pdf's. (Sometimes, if they're small, I just print them into OneNote and write there)
A thing many problably don't know: OneNote supports LaTex (with some differences) in the equation editor
I also write all my lectures this way and output to slides using backslide (remark.js).
I have two text files always open, `_inbox.md` (all unorganized incoming notes) and `_work.md` (tasks list and dates).
I've tried a bunch of different things and this is the only thing I seem to stick to. I sync it to multiple machines with BoxSync and keep it all in a git repo (for when I care about tracking changes, usually my commits are weekly, with useless commit messages).
A Leuchtterm1917 dotted notebook + mechanical pencil + ink/gel hybrid pen.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003ENUIKC/ref=s9_acsd_hps...
For work I do under employment I tend to use org-mode and publish to whatever format suits them best. Often one of PDF, HTML, or Markdown.
I have been experimenting with using an org-mode based publishing system that syncs with my ReMarkable... it is taking over some of my note-taking. But I'm a chronic journal-keeper and have over a decade of notes and experience with my system.
I take a lot of "scratch" notes on paper, but often end up copying them into the computer at the end of the workweek. Usually they are quite a mess, and preserving them as-is makes for a challenge when using them in the future.
The other nice thing about notes on the computer is that they are easy to move around, tag, edit, etc. I can also integrate a tool like Zotero into my workflow, using pandoc-citeproc to keep a true bibliography and reference list.
I'm not saying you need all of those things, obviously. But I find them really helpful, and I would like to know how your system obviates the need for things like that. Do you write URLs by hand?
Meticulously.
For each subject I keep notes on (projects, mathematics, reading, etc) I use a series of journals and different styles.
For my projects I use a system somewhat similar to bullet journal[0]. The Leuchtterm journals are a great fit (and I'm glad I discovered them) because the pages are numbered and come with an index. I use the pocket at the back for reference cards.
I like taking notes using my personal notation and being able to think in a quiet room without a glowing screen, notifications, or the temptation to check HN is valuable. It helps me get in the flow and solve the real problems. When I get back to my work at the computer it's usually pretty rote.
For mathematics I use a dotted-pad with a system I developed for myself. I use smaller, lined books for my reading and diary.
And they all stay in my office in my home indexed by shelf. And it looks quite handsome I think. I don't know whether it will be a boon or a burden to those I leave behind when I'm gone some day but I enjoy having a hard reference copy of my development and ideas.
How well does the pencil write on the Leuchtterm1917? I've definitely noticed that a lot of the notebooks people talk about—those by Rhodia, for instance—are great for using pens, but they don't have enough tooth for pencils to write well. I think I remember feeling the pages of the Leuchtterm in a bookstore and noticing the same smoothness, so I didn't pick one up. Was I mistaken?
I did try a Rhodia pad for my mathematics once when my order with the store was delayed and it wasn't as pleasing. It worked fine but the lead does smear a little bit too easily for the reasons you mentioned.
It's also been useful for a 'show rather than tell' approach to technical Confluence documentation.
I've previously used LICEcap and Screenflow, but SnagIt also has some nice video capture options, with an option to convert to animated GIF. Also becoming a bit of a fan of Camtasia, but the output is regular video.
Both support Markdown and Syntax Highlighting. Quiver is lot more full featured programmer's notebook but I like Bear because its light and I prefer tag system.
The downside is that it's Apple-only at the moment. It's not a problem for me right now since I'm deep in the Apple ecosystem, but I'm keeping my eyes open for alternatives that are as polished as Bear, but are cross-platform.
Worst-case scenario, Bear can dump out to markdown files on disk (images too) if I ever need to migrate to something else.
Since then I've been able to forge 20 years of references, scans, pdfs, application-code!, shell scripts, photos, glyphs, graphs, fonts into an exo-brain (a nice word from the cool kids) that not only includes journals, time & billing, ledgers, feeds, project and resource planning, play-books & checklists for my own debriefing
into something version controlled that boots from a chroot and can transfer to android devices. i can now find, use and profit from clusters of notes, generate html and latex, read, write and code, interface with and even capture just about anything that life has thrown at me since i started re-tooling myself.
I've got a reminder/drill mechanism which picks high-level topics things for me to review and i just go with that to remember and refine old stuff as i go. Its a seething mess of useful.
In essence .. i tag, sort, sift, condense and categorize like everyone else. In under a gig of ram, and, as it happens, at the speed of thought via a consistent user-interface.
And yeah, of course i use a browser. I can capture/convert html to plain text & drag images into files knowing that everything will always be hyperlinked by not-too-obnoxious uuids.
For some reason I had to hold my nose delving into emacs after ignoring it for 20 years. It seemed so weird. Now that I've gotten used to working with software that enables general purpose computing, I'm experiencing Ataraxia.
Anyhow, to the OP, check your net-present-value figures. Are you expecting to be a knowledge worker for a while? Have you ever chosen a slightly harder path to make things easier?
If so, just take this note as a hint for what's possible when you're seriously looking to answer your own question :)
Zim is great if you need some type of markup (ex:- hyper links, bullet points etc.,). Vim is great for plain text.
If the notes are private but need to be shared across multiple machines, I create a private gitlab project.
If the notes are public, I either create a github project or put them on a public wiki where only I can edit. For the public wiki, I am using an account on shoutwiki <http://www.shoutwiki.com> .
I briefly investigated tiddlywiki, used OneNote heavily for a while.
Currently I'm migrating to using JupyterLab notebooks on an ec2 instance with IP whitelisting.
It works pretty well, I have a kind of dream to connect it to a Datomic server instead of using filesystem notebooks and have relational notes.
What's the benefit of datomic vs. filesystem?
Most of my notes are to do with data or programming, and a lot are just script fragments on how to do something, I want to run them.
In theory I could hack jupyter and datomic to enable me to define relatinoships and query for notes instead of having either a text search or a single hierarchy navigation
I plan to make sure organizational time pays off in the short term, and need to work up a 'site map' for my various digital collections (in the off chance anyone cares after I'm gone). Sharing as much as possible starts to make sense in the long term, so classifying what "must be private" must be done as part of the process. (A tiny bit of this aspect is reflected in how useful my own StackOverflow contributions have been across jobs!)
In this light, tools encouraging sharing useful specific technical info semi-privately within a small group of very close professional friendships start to make a lot of sense.
Also GitHub gists have been of great help.
If you want to try (in test mode now) send me an email to the address from my profile
I use orgmode, starting with a buffer with a few headings, URLs, and paragraphs on a topic. The buffer may be killed the same day or turn into 100k words spread over a few files a few years later, still easily searchable with org-agenda or grep and automatically exported to HTML for viewing on mobile. I don't bother with images or mobile editing due to complications--those are the main drawbacks.
We've been doing it from day 1 and realise how valuable is and will be, going forward. https://weardulo.com/blogs/origins
Depending on the "officialness," I write things down on either a legal pad or in a lab notebook dedicated to a project. Then the most important bits of this gets put into an org-mode "notebook."
I prefer writing things down first, I find that it sharpens my thinking around whatever I'm recording.
Though there are some other interesting ideas in here that I may try and steal.
My answer is the same. The tools don't matter much at all when it comes to documenting knowledge. Whatever gets used is best. Searchable is a plus.
I have a repository with many markdown files (https://github.com/nikitavoloboev/knowledge) and I render it all with GitBook here (https://wiki.nikitavoloboev.xyz).
Has anyone used multiple wikis and can comment on the pros and cons? There are so many out there. The only one I know I don't like is Tiddlywiki.