DigitalOcean gives you more RAM and SSD for the same price
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
DigitalOcean gives you more RAM and SSD for the same price (compared to itself before the change, but still less than competitors)
The word "you" in that headline highlights the problem with "journalism" today. It's just advertising for products or subjective viewpoints.
A proper AP style guide headline would be: Digital Ocean Improves Performance of Cloud Server 'Droplets'.
Edit: I wonder if someone earned their free flight and accommodations for the next Digital Ocean conference.
There is a difference between journalism and blogging. Unfortunately, it's a gap that gets wider each day.
Really? Because the users on HN, Reddit, and the internet as a whole bemoaned the shut down of Gawker by Thiel, when he went after them for outing him and Hulk Hogan.
The whole user base said Thiel was attacking journalism, when all he did was shutdown a gossip blog.
Really? It's my recollection that most of the communities I'm involved in applauded and relished in the shutdown of Gawker. I do believe there were some tangential worries that meandered around the forest of "freedom of speech"/"-of the press" but as the dust settled I think all parties realized those worries were, as a consensus, ill-informed.
That doesn't mean this is a journalism-wide problem, or even a problem, if you consume TechCrunch knowing that. Nothing about this article is a broader indictment of your scare quoted "journalism," otherwise you're essentially saying TechCrunch put out PR fluff, boy, the field that includes NYT and The Guardian and ProPublica is just problematic, isn't it?
That doesn't mean this is a journalism-wide problem
I've seen headlines like this on every major publication for the the last 5 years (since I started paying attention to topics I am knowledgeable about). Once you become a dedicated expert on a subject, you are enlightened to the journalistic spin of that subject. The topics you are unfamiliar with is where journalism exploits because you cannot dispute it.EDIT: Reply below is constantly changing and being edited and I am shadow-banned from replying to it.
My point is that a single publication does not an indictment of an entire field make. You can criticize TechCrunch all you want, and I'd probably agree with you; the quality has decreased significantly, and yellow presser write-thrus are very common now, and it's not even a publication I read. That's the key: it's not a publication that I read, nor that you need to read. They exist independently of the journalism profession as a whole, don't reflect on it, and can disappear without impacting the rest of the landscape. They have a very specific audience. You are not in it. Part of that audience is startup PR, who they actively court because they need the material.
With "fake news" and all that, journalism as a profession is under fire. I absolutely hate to see discussions like this that personify journalism as a boogeyman, out to exploit and "get you," based on one yellow presser that is suddenly "the problem with journalism."
Stop broadening to attack an entire field of mostly good people based on one publication and/or article you don't like. Imagine if that was tried with literally anything else: imagine if we indicted biosciences based on Theranos ("the problem with genetic testing today") or hedge funds based on Martin Shkreli ("the problem with finance today") or engineering based on Peter Madsen ("the problem with rocketry today") or computer science research based on Uber ("the problem with self-driving today"). There are bad actors in the world, but journalism seems to attract commentary like this, where a bad actor suddenly means the whole field is indictable. That makes absolutely zero sense, and the more I argue against it, the more I'm convinced it's a willful siege by people who know what they're doing.
EDIT: Got to a desktop machine and poked around their site for a few minutes, they appear to offer metadata support (https://www.vultr.com/metadata/) but I don't see anything for user data, which is unfortunate and seems really easy to add.
EDIT2: I can't find specific documentation on how to access the user data but they have a page on cloud-init which makes reference to such an option (https://www.vultr.com/docs/getting-started-with-cloud-init)
But is it really that much of an accomplishment to be offering more resources for the same money, given significant drops in hardware prices over the past couple of years?
And I still see the same problem of some resources scaling linearly with money while others do not. For example, going from $40 to $80 gets you twice as much RAM and SSD space, but only 50% more processing power (6 vCPUs vs. 4) and only 20% more transfer (6 TB vs. 5). Doesn't this just encourage people to work on "scaling out" rather than "scaling up"?
Edit: from my experience, I would still recommend anyone but the most budget-conscious go with DO over OVH.
RAM prices have nearly doubled over the last 6 months and more than tripled over the last 18 months.
Also, isn't it less costly for DO to provision 1 "large" server with 1 static IP address than it is to provision 2 "small" ones with 2 static IP addresses?
Not that it's critical for a hobby project, of course.
Edit: So I guess it's still $5/month. https://twitter.com/digitalocean/status/953304176280432646
Yay competition!
Vultr has a $2.50 option that DO is lacking. This looks better for simple webpages. I've tried GoDaddy cheap hosting product, but I was turned off by all the spam I get in my email and difficulty installing Let's Encrypt certificates.
For example every domain on route 53 costs you while Do is free. Their spaces is also a great offering. See this example in which S3 costs $184 usd while do costs $10usd [1]
Anybody care to enlighten me?
EDIT: Although I should add that my experience in using DO has made me a fan...so I guess the branding/marketing worked on me to get the initial relationship started; and, now their performance (e.g. uptime, security, etc.) has kept me there, as a happy fan. ;-)
I can't answer you, but I'd like to know about the alternatives-, thanks!
- If they are different than Google Cloud, AWS...
They list the ARMv7 board C1 as €3/month. It breaks down to:
- €1 for the actual machine
- €1 for the 50GB LSSD (obviously it is required to boot)
- €1 for the IP address
(obviously not counting VAT)
Now, the €1 does not appear out of thin air, and in fact you are billed an hourly rate initially, for each of those resources. However, at the end of the month, you get billed whichever is cheaper between the time*hourly rate and the monthly rate (which is €1).
You can also deallocate the IP address if you don't need it. (source: I’m a scaleway customer, and I believe that kind of information is available inside deeply nested FAQ pages somewhere on their website)
OVH is about 8 bucks a month for me for 8GB of ram (a thanksgiving promo) when I first moved to them I was paying 3.50 for 2GB. They will soon have a datacenter in the US too.
For my needs DO is a ripoff.