Email sucks. Time saving tips from Kevin Rose
kevinrose.com
kevinrose.com
If you are a founder, entrepreneur or similar then your (filtered, non-spam, non-bacn) email is contextual to your business relationships and actually prioritizing your time to properly tend to it is important.
This whole "I have over 1000 unread emails, oh my!" crap just feels like bad email management and poor time keeping.
I filter away all twitter/facebook/plancast auto-notifications, intentionally avoid mailing lists unless there is an RSS option and keep very on top of spam using similar email address tricks (I tend to use <foo>@<mydomain> but it's the same deal).
So with the Spam and Bacn taken care of, I actually am left with a very manageable amount of ham ('real') email every day and so I set aside the appropriate amount of time to deal with it because it is all high-value messages.
Things work out fine, relationships are founded/maintained and I don't have to email people automatically telling them I couldn't be bothered to read their email in 14 days - which would make them look unimportant and me look like a bit of a douche.
I'd wager he gets hundreds of emails per day from random people, some of whom could actually be important. This is in addition to internal email lists at his company, VIPs, etc. I get dozens and I'm quite a bit less public/important than Kevin Rose.
Say he gets the following daily:
30 messages from people he knows 150 emails from fans, strangers, some of whom might be worth responding to 50 internal company emails that merit SOME attention
That's 220 emails per day to process. Say 150ish on the weekends, so he has 300+ to process every morning. Now say he takes a 1 week vacation.
Call it an average of 1 minute per email for processing (some are near 0, some need to be scanned, some need to be carefully read, some require short replies, some require longer replies). That's 4+ hours per day.
What he needs is an assistant to go thru the "I don't know you" pile to see if there is any "ham".
I was more talking from the perspective of 'regular folk' implementing his methods into their own work-stream. What is appropriate for him is not appropriate for the majority.
I know a number of 'normal' folks who also have the "1000+ unread emails in my inbox" issue who are not a Kevin Rose/Scoble/etc... I don't see their excuse.
I hope you meant some of which.
Those are all glaringly obvious spam though, to the point that I've begun suspecting that they're just using me to confirm that suspected spam really is spam.
I used to obfuscate my email address, but realized it doesn't matter. Spammers will get at you no matter what (unused email addresses get spam), and obfuscation just annoys people who would like to contact you. I let GMail do its job.
That, on top of the relay requests, would fill up a single day's logfile 5 times faster than authorized traffic.
We have Spam filters. Why not Content filters? (ok, a ham strainer)
I want unlimited, user-defined bayesian filters for my email. Flag everything political-sounding, and have it (reasonably accurately) filtered - no more FUD chain letters in your main inbox! Flag anything funny - get a humor folder. Flag everything that's a bug report - get a bug report folder. Ultimately, you have an auto-sorting tagging system defined by your needs.
I'm primarily thinking it'd work for people with high-to-very-high email volume, as then the filters would have enough to learn from. But even if it's somewhat inaccurate, pre-sorted mail would be extremely useful to me - you just have to correct it occasionally, instead of correcting it every time.
---------
More on-topic, the single-most-useful thing I've done to manage my inbox has been to make a "this week" query-based folder. Far fewer things fall out of my attention that way, because it's a reasonable amount to scroll over if I've got a bit of time - something I never did when I had 3k+ in the same view.
I'm personally planning on developing my own at some point ("learning" programs fascinate me), but that might fit the bill in the meantime (probably a few years...).
e.g. Instead of address+foo@domain.tld - try not signing up for shady lists in the first place. Has anything of value come out of a newsletter from a dicey web site?
Shady lists probably are not his main problem.
I find it incredibly hard to understand how anyone could have a thousand personal worthwhile messages coming in every day. I guess an Internet celebrity (or famous angel investor!) would have a large number of contact attempts each day, but that counts as work email, right? (The author's post says "1002 unread personal".)
Regarding your second point, I do think it is possible to have many hundred mails per day of personnal sollicitations which I would call legitimate mails.
When most people cross the street no one cares and they can move freely. If it is a well known person, like a star, many people will try to talk to him, ask for something, or whatever to the point they can't move or even become in danger. So it is possible that some people become overdrawn by legitimate mails. But this is quite exceptional and concluding from this that "mail sucks" is not very fair.
It sucks and in many ways, but not because of that type of situation.
Currently have 92. Must. Leave. HN.
correction to tip #4: iPhone's append "Sent from my iPhone" not "Sent from iPhone". i'd notice the missing "my". "Sent from my mobile." is just fine and probably a better approach.
Obligatory note: this doesn't work with all signup forms, unfortunately.
Anyone who validates email addresses by doing anything other than sending you an email is doing it wrong.
O'Reilly@example.com
"Foo@Bar"@example.com
http://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/21/i-knew-how-to-validate...
1. I create rules for every Exchange DL that I consider important. This is the first line of defense.
2. Any email that I receive that I am not in the to or cc line is sent to a "Check Later" email folder. Either someone bcc'd me, or someone (maybe me) adding me to a DL that I didn't create a rule for.
3. My Inbox should contain only mail that is directly to me.
4. Any mail in my Inbox that is not actionable (either I'm done with it or it's informational) is filed away.
Of course, these strategies only work for certain people (I'm just a cog in a machine), but it has done wonders for keeping my Inbox manageable. I rely heavily on Outlook Search to find mails that I remember seeing but have filed away (I have a single "I've read these mails and want to keep them" folder).
My running dream is that it would be web based (but not a todo list) and would be based on the idea of a project built of tasks with definite finishing points, and subprojects, and the ability to direct other people to them and ask/answer questions, make notes, verify things and confirm tasks are complete.
I picture it in my head as Etherpad meets old-school vertical scrolling 2D games meets Gantt charts meets braiding ( http://theautry.org/ortega/images/four_string_braid.jpg ), I guess meets Google Wave though I've never used it.
The braids go to other people "request input from Alice, then verification from Bob, then back to me for implementation", and as the "view" scrolls, the completed tasks are fixed in time and cannot be altered, but can be brought back up to the front for reattention.
I put it here so I can note it somewhere and because it's related to how annoying email is to use for ongoing work between people. I'm suspicious that it's impractical if delved into in any depth, and that the good bits are done in some existing tracker / helpdesk / ticket / project management software if I knew how to look for that kind of thing.
Or possibly even (I hate to say it) sharepoint.
The fix -- a quick'n'dirty script that moves all those emails over to RSS: http://github.com/danshoutis/mail-to-rss
Caveat: if you're using Google Reader, you need to put the output RSS+HTML into a non-password-protected place, which means someone who can guess the URL can read your stuff. (For maximum convenience, I'm just dumping it into the public folder of my dropbox account.)
It certainly needs polishing, but not so much that I've felt the need to work on it recently. :)
This is more appropriate if you mostly lurk on mailing lists; if there was a list I was highly active on, I'd probably treat it differently.
1. Don't subscribe to mailing lists. Really, don't.
2. Answer yes or no questions with a yes or a no.
3. Don't reply if the email doesn't require (or warrant) a response.
Regarding 3) VIP filter -- That's how I'm currently using AwayFind [1] with my GMail in Google Apps. My most frequent VIP filter is {if they reply today} but for some people I'll do {if they reply this week} and I get a phone call and it's read back to me. The context and timing is the important thing for me. The really powerful feature is specific words (optional) but I'm presently inclined to rely on my own reply behavior to set the tone of my perceived inbox. It's pretty addicting.
[1] #include 'disclaimer.h' /* I'm an advisor */
Doesn't really help with huge volumes of email, but it does help when you have to find that email you were sent last week along with 7000 other emails.
Then I follow GTD of having an empty email box.
I've been on the receiving end of some short/terse emails and I have to say that my impression is not positive. I understand people are busy, but when I read short replies to emails that don't make sense it doesn't make me feel special at all :(
Or you could use Safari 5, which has it built in.
Aesthetics are a terrible grounds upon which to dismiss textual information.