this article is highly misleading and is clearly shoehorning particular statistics in to paint a rather manipulative and damning portrait of a greedy jeff bezos and the soulless company he's running. that's okay, i assume anyone here would have the mental wherewithal to discern this sort of trickery and not allow such drivel to influence their opinions too much.

the reality is that the few people in the first world (let's face it, if you're reading hackernews, you're probably in the first world) aren't benefiting directly from amazon in someway, whether it be directly or indirectly.

it's frustrating to see this generalized hatred towards anyone who surpasses a certain level of success, as if what he's doing to make the world a better place isn't quite enough and he should be off in africa spoonfeeding starving children. it's such a cartoonish and unrealistic notion that anyone with that amount of money would be able to solve the most complex issues that we face as a species simply because he has a high net worth.

i'd take facebook, google and amazon as my technocratic overlords over just facebook and google any year of the millenium.