This seems a bit unfair. Outsiders who agree with Yudkowsky are more likely to become insiders.Any cult could say that, however. One question I'd ask, is how likely is it for outsiders who partially agree with Yudkowsky to become insiders? Quite often, it's much less the "leader" and much more the mob inside a cult which creates much of the cult-like atmosphere. I remember posting an idea in the HPMOR reddit about creating a muggle magic detection device that could be used to game-balance the power of the muggle world vs. the magical world. The knee-jerk reactions, followed by the feeling that I must be a horrible person for doing so made me pause.
It's about how to tell the differences between the circumstances where you should trust your instincts vs those where you should go with the crowd.
So, in part, it's how to tell if you're being suborned by groupthink.
Always keep in mind that scene from The Life of Brian, where the crowd shouts, "We are all individuals!"
The thing to keep in mind when trying to start a movement of rationalists that doesn't take on the qualities of a cult: Ask yourself if you are as smart and self aware as others who have tried the same. Why is it you will succeed where those others have failed?
(Do I think the Less Wrong crowd is a cult? It's a foregone conclusion that any such group has grown an outer rind which has at least some cult-like qualities. The real question is, what is the state of the inside? And if you are inside, how do you know you haven't been suborned by groupthink?)