Human-shaped pylons carry electricity across Iceland
wired.co.uk
wired.co.uk
>An architecture and design firm called Choi+Shine has submitted a design for the Icelandic High-Voltage Electrical Pylon International Design Competition which proposes giant human-shaped pylons carrying electricity cables across the country's landscape.
Meaning the title should be closer to "Human-shaped pylons could carry electricity across Iceland". Though given all the press lately, and how much I like the idea, I really hope they do build them. It's something unique that'll last for a long time; there should be more of that in the world.
2) You will probably always have someone by the balls
It's not enough to have a "renewable" source of income (such as tourism, moderate farming/fishing, solar energy, etc...). Everyone, including countries, also have bills to pay. And if you have a debt you also have to pay the interest on your debts.
As long as the money they make from this renewable energy source is less than what they need to pay for their bills (e.g to import food) plus the interest in their debt, they are still losing money.
I do like the idea of artistic designs of mundane structures. In Portland they decided to combat graffiti and vandalism on bus stops by sandblasting motifs into the glass: http://trimet.org/publicart/busshelters.htm
That addresses the consequences of a problem and not the root causes. It is important to stop the cause of petty vandalism.
I can take a bet that if most countries had corporal punishment and applied it readily and liberally to vandalism cases, both vandalism and other offenses would be stopped.
In the west people continue to do crimes (and let off) until they do a major crime (when it is too late to change entrenched behaviour).
I fail to see that in these links. I think a more appropriate set of citations would be:
basic research
http://www.religioustolerance.org/spanking_menu.htm
against corporal punishment as an educative method
http://www.apa.org/about/governance/council/policy/corporal- punishment.aspx
http://www.nospank.net/vcb.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/spankin4.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/spankin29.htm
for corporal punishment as an educative method
http://www.corpun.com/ukju9803.htm
http://www.corpun.com/10archive/ukd01001.htm#21929
I personally find a lack of serious psychological research that finds correlation between corporal punishment and increase of quality of life in the society where it is practiced. That observation makes me believe that this practice should be abolished, or severely restricted at least.
This is the same as the “powerlines causes cancer” research (people living near powerlines tend to be poorer and more prone to cancer). And powerlines is not even an ideological viewpoint!
The problem is that I can give you a slew of papers saying that “corporal punishment has no detrimental effects” and you can give me another slew saying it has detrimental effects. Such internet discussions will not go anywhere (the same as with the death penalty or gun rights). Perhaps I was wrong to bring this up in YCNews (since this is not the forum for such debates).
In any case, in the country of Singapore they have less crime and fewer problems that 99% of Western countries. Yet they have very strict laws (including corporal and capital punishment for drug offences).
EDIT: The original point I wanted to make was this:
In the USA, tough punishment only comes after the criminal has firmly established his bad behaviour. Any pet owner knows that at that stage it is the most difficult to change set behaviour.
You have silly things such as three strikes laws. Why? The third time that behaviour is fixed.
If that same person were punished severely for his first crime (however minor) he would think twice about breaking the law.
That is how it works in Singapore - the first crime is punished hard, and the behaviour doesn't re-occur.
> the first crime is punished hard, and the behaviour doesn't re-occur.
Of course it "doesn't re-occur" -- the person is already dead the second time around ;-)
I think we can agree both tasks are handled nicely.
Also amusing, a story on electricity delivery, in "Wired".
I learned from industrial designers at Black & Decker that form can enhance and suggest function.
Just changing the shape of a cordless vacuum cleaner changed peoples impression from "This is a shitty, low-powered vacuum cleaner" to "This is a terrific powered dustpan"
http://www.blackanddecker.com/dustbuster/dustbuster_innovati...
Just changing the outside shape - with no change in product specs. - made the DustBuster into one of the highest selling Black & Decker products ever.
Since they are variable, they should make ones modeled after Tricia Helfer and Grace Park. Cylon Pylons!
http://unrealitymag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/maxim-bat...
At least, I assume it's for the same competition, as it's over a year old.
Pretty awesome stuff.
It was discussed extensively since we had a massive power outage in 1998 caused by icing rain that affected about 3 millions for 3 weeks.
So burying cables might work well in a city for a while but I really don't think its any silver bullet.