However, _not all treatments work for everyone_. Certain SSRI's work for some and not others. This also holds for exercise.
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26978184 [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674785/
Low energy often comes with depression. So it's not easy as telling a depressed person to "do more exercises".
Depression is "invisible". I like to think that being depressed is like having a broken leg. You can't just get better by yourself, you need proper medical treatment.
Replace the broken leg with a generic bad back (non surgical) and it's not a bad equivalence.
Medical advice in many cases is to do things which hurt (exercise, stretching, lose weight) otherwise the back won't get better, but doing nothing will almost certainly lead to stagnation or a worsening of the condition. You can take pills which may reduce the pain, but those are not really a long term solution on their own.
I don't wish to diminish how hard it is (in either case, intentionally causing yourself discomfort is utterly exhausting in every way). It often is both possible and beneficial so be wary of writing off a school of thought entirely.
In the same way, being in good physical shape, eating healthful foods, sleeping well every night, and not being stressed won't solve every medical problem. But a dependable and healthy body does solve some problems directly, and reduces most of the rest by orders of magnitude.
Every week there's a study that being poor causes a lot of damage to your body (on the DNA level IIRC).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2824975/
Not saying these meds don't work, they actually might work "too well" in some ways and that surveillance of and constant checking-in with patients is very important especially at the beginning and during periods after stopping treatment.
clearly there have been people helped by psychiatry, but clearly a lot of it has been debunked because, not a surprise, science is supposed to debunk itself and self-correct and iterate to better things.
so while in general it’s a losing proposition to say the field has no value, we need to separate the concept of science from specifics of how it’s practiced in particular cases. this is not a black and white issue. some drugs and practices and practitioners can be life saving while others are the opposite.
it would be interesting to know how right this article gets things for the claims it makes.
Thanks for writing this!