Golang is self sufficient for a small scale web app.
It has HTML templates library, decent error handling, rpc, logging, built-in http server. Many people choose golang for that reason.
It has HTML templates library, decent error handling, rpc, logging, built-in http server. Many people choose golang for that reason.
Or do you mean single page JavaScript web sites? At which point Go would be the backing API? I don't see what qualifies Go for "small scale" vs "large scale."
Thanks for any clarification. Cheers!
A larger project is more likely to require features provided by third-party packages.
Go was not designed for the small scale, but the large:
- it has a sensible module system that makes compilation fast
- it's a simple language that encourages boring code - your coworkers will probably write code that works and that you can maintain
- Multithreading is a first class concept. Programs you build locally using typical patterns scale when you run them on massive multi-core servers
- the language is memory safe by default
C++ projects require experts to build, scale and maintain. Go is designed to give that capability to journeyman developers.
Yes C++ is generally going to be faster, but rarely do people talk about why that is. It usually comes down to: a smarter compiler, unsafe operations, or clever optimization. The first is legitimate, but rarely that significant. The second is a penalty that's usually worth keeping (you want bounds checking on arrays), and the third misses the point.
Sure the expert c++ developer could write faster code, but is that who you have? Are you going to take the time to do all that optimization work?
No, apr_pools.h was not custom written to make some programming language look better on a toy benchmark!