Caste violence erupts in India over 200-year-old faultline
ksat.com
ksat.com
We never discussed caste. It was a non-issue.
Prime Minister Modi is also Low Caste. That didn't stop him from being elected.
Of course this is being opposed by "community leaders".
Interesting a woman from my home town was recently abused for being low caste. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-38663143
It would be interesting to beak down H1B's by caste
It's more about your education level and how useful you are than who your ancestors were, but that is many times intertwined.
Edit: India, like most places, is in the middle of re-drawing it's caste system along socioeconomic lines. Of course, the lower castes will still be on the bottom and possibly discriminated against due to being behind on resources being passed down to them.
While Indians in the US tend toward the upper castes, it's not true that there aren't any people in the US of lower caste as well. Even in India the disparity between the castes is narrowing as affirmative action and modernization render such differences moot–as such, it isn't really true that people of lower cast have a "lack of resources", so there are people that are able to come over.
Most of the violent aspects of caste discrimination occur at lower socioeconomic levels, where the intensity of the tribalism is exacerbated by poverty.
However, many middle class Indians in the US still follow traditional caste rules in aspects of their personal lives, particularly in marriage, and sometimes in other social associations.
There is also some selection bias among many Indian immigrants towards egalitarianism, leaving behind stifling aspects of the old culture.
The horrible acts of discrimination described in the article are a product of both the Indian social structure and the local communal conflicts.
Hence, in places like the US, Indians are more likely to have professional spouses, whether those spouses are Indian or not.
Is it offensive to ask this about indians in the US?
As for offensiveness, I don't remember anybody asking me about my caste (outside of govt forms-they need it for job/educational reservations) except once. He (an Indian from my state) didn't ask me my caste, he heard my name and immediately said "oh you are a Nair" and I felt really weird and wanted to end the conversation quickly. If a foreigner asks me, I don't think I would mind. I am not sure if I would be comfortable if an Indian asks me though.
Nair is actually included in my name so you get the caste info just by getting my name.
How's it not so? (Asking, not flaming. I know this is a complex topic and invariably leads to shouting matches.)
The idea of caste being used as a means and justification for oppression, violence etc is just plain wrong. I don't think it could be more black and white - to borrow another loaded figure of speech.
If we disagree, let's agree to disagree without violence?
How can our increasingly global society grow robust to provocations?
For those interested, here is a good piece by Venkatesh Rao which touches upon this subject: https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2016/11/10/king-ruinous-and-the-c...
As to the specific incident in the news, I would only say that it is not hard to find a couple hundred men for Rs. 500 who would go about trashing cars and buses for a few hours, while the police would have instructions not to act too strongly against them, for fear of further conflagration. Once this is done, it is all up to journalists, op-ed writers to offer up (and amplify) their favorite perspectives.