If there were really a high demand for this, you'd see women setting up their profiles this way on all the ordinary dating sites (private profile, no messages). And maybe they do, but then why a special site when you can get the same experience with an existing site that has a lot more members?
There could be a slight difference, because on this site, all men who sign up would be aware that they initiate a message, and all women would be aware that they have to initiate. This could (not sure, of course) lead to a different dynamic than a site that mainly works on a different set of rules.
Personally, I'm glad to see a site like this. I lack the insanity that most men have about finding a date. Sending 100s of messages to get back a single 'we're not compatible' is not my idea of fun. So I don't bother any more.
But this... Yeah, I'll probably get a lot of crazy women to weed through, but I think that's better than the other way.
Love this! (man here) and I think it's a great idea. However, a word of caution: French dating site AdopteUnMec started that way, but then became a "normal" dating site, I think.
So women are only permitted to search for men? No lesbians allowed? After the eHarmony lawsuit and $500,000 payout, you'd think dating sites wouldn't want to repeat that disaster.
Lawsuits like that are stupid as I'm sure if you were straight you couldn't sue a homosexual dating site!
too right! lawsuit in the making!
The success of this site will all depend on the amount of females it can attract who actually go on dates.
They may want to rethink the thirteen step registration process. A bit much, IMO.
Actually, I found it not bad. The reason being for each step you were only asked one question. The alternative to that is one page with 13 questions... and I think tests would show more people would finish the one question per page method.