Why not focus on the root company and family actually getting rich off selling the damned opioids (Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers, respectively)?
I don't understand how this company and family haven't been sued into the ground yet.
Why not focus on the root company and family actually getting rich off selling the damned opioids (Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers, respectively)?
I don't understand how this company and family haven't been sued into the ground yet.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/30/the-family-tha...
They've been able to do it before.
Also, what are we really looking for? Do addicts really know whether they were overprescribed? Is being addicted sufficient cause for a lawsuit?
Anyway, I'm not saying it's unsolvable, but I can imagine some tougher hurdles than the class action suits I've been privy to.
That isn't the sole reason, but if you compare the "shadowy financier" tone of many stories about right-of-center families to the stories about opioids, you'll see that the "shadowiness" component of the reporting suddenly disappears.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/investigations/...
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/30/the-family-tha...
EDIT: I googled it, I see where you're going with that...
The reason it matters is that political clout and general goodwill helps shield them from legislative action and judicial inquiry.
[Living in Texas] in a modern hilltop mansion on the outskirts of the city, in an area favored by tech entrepreneurs. According to tax disclosures from his personal foundation, he has continued giving money to Yale, but his largest donation in 2015 was a hundred-thousand-dollar gift to a neoconservative think tank, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/30/the-family-tha...
https://www.google.com/search?q=family+behind+opioid+epidemi...
"The Family That Built an Empire of Pain"
"Secretive Family"
"Secretive Sackler Family"
"The Family That's Killing Millions"
"American Cartel"
etc.