The Lonely Future of Buying Stuff
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
China is similarly dominant for manufacturing. It's no longer about cost, it's about the concentration of expertise and cross-fertilization that results. Because of automation nobody will ever have the cost advantage that gave China its current dominance so China will remain the hub for the foreseeable future.
Speaking from firsthand experience, if you want to have anything with a circuit in it prototyped, picking a Shenzhen area factory to work with has many advantages. You can have new circuit boards printed and tested within a day. This kind of ecosystem may be hard to replicate elsewhere.
On the other hand, for many other physical products proximity to the end customer is becoming the primary concern. Consider that as real wages in China are increasing, you’re looking at a 20-30% wage increase over the last 4-5 years in China. This means that any cost advantage over other countries is rapidly closing. Chinese raw materials and electricity are no cheaper than in the rest of the world. Due to new factors like increasingly stringent environmental regulations, many of these other inputs are increasing in cost. (http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2058175/chine...)
If I want to have a plastics part mass produced, there are a number of regions in the US where there is near-parity with China when you factor in shipping costs, insurance, tariffs, the costs of delays and defects etc.
For industries like textiles, there’s already been significant flight to India and Southeast Asia.
And Chinese brands like Li-Ning grabs all other markets.
The vast majority of software are written a) in house b) outside of SV c) in Java and C#
It doesn't even require any human experts to run, so why does it matter where the experts live?
For now, there is at least an initial "activation energy" hump to get over in terms of training people to assemble shoes. A sneaker or dress shoe may seem simple, but there are hundreds of individual stitches that are essential for a quality product. If you're interested, look into the story of American Giant. To make clothes in North Carolina, they had to implement extensive training for the entire supply chain for their clothing.
Some simpler footwear products are actually already made in the U.S. The custom orthotics for my running shoes were measured for and made in the U.S.
Second - all the other costs in low wage countries are also a lot lower. Combine that with how absurdly cheap international shipping is and there is no reason to relocate the manufacture of low-margin goods to the US until you are really starting to talk about the costs of automation being so efficient the extra pennies on shipping will make a difference in earnings. Given the expense of maintaining real assets in the U.S., i.e., buildings (utilities, maintenance, insurance, taxes, building), this is likely to be a while.
A lot of this work will be automated in the coming decades to the point where the effect of wage costs is marginal. In addition, the salaries in developing countries will continue to increase, eventually catching up Western nations. At that point the main factors are probably tax/import policies, price of enercy etc.
2. Currency Exchange Rate (i.e State Manipulation)
3. Raw Supply Chain Location
4. Government Subsidies
5. Large Domestic Market
Plenty of reasons why the shoes may continue to be made in China or in the Region.
Companies move for a number of reasons, Raw Wages are often not as high on the list as people believe, at least not these days. Government Regulations, Taxation, and other non-wage factors are much higher
The other factor I imagine is proximity/availability of raw resources, and refineries of raw resources: if you're not shipping those shoes across the world, you still have to transport the plastic, leather, rubber etc to make them.
- Location selected based on cost of labor.
- Major port is developed to deal with large amounts of goods
- A few more factories/industries start in same area due to port accessibility
- Refineries are built to be close to location of usage (now they import raw materials instead of refined materials)
- More factories are built due to easy availability of resources + accessible port for export
- Labor gets more expensive, but economies of scale of factories + refineries means it is cheaper to stay in place then to move elsewhere
- Automation slowly displaces labour.
End result being that economies of scale in manufacturing and refining make it cheaper to centralise manufacture and pay for shipping the end product than to decentralise and pay for small factories/refineries everywhere + shipping of raw resources.As a thought experiment if there was a magical 3d printer that could take any number of raw materials as inputs and combine them in any way would it become more efficient to ship a mix of raw materials to each end consumer? Say I consume x amount of rubber, y amount of cotton, z amount of plastic, etc in my consumer goods in a day, week, month whatever. Could it be more efficient to get the rubber and cotton to my door and run them through the printer than it would to build the shoes, basketballs and t-shirts somewhere else and ship them?
It's a bit like Blue Apron etc; you pay a small premium for the theatre of doing the assembly step yourself.
Proximity to resources is priced in to 'cost', no?
Of course then things would be expensive...
They compete by being extremely efficient with their use of labor hours and cutting waste. Just-in-time everything.
I'd be careful to extrapolate your direct experience to indicate trends.
Hoenstly, the chemicals are horrendus and chrome's days are numbered in any capacity thanks to new mirror finish water based paint. Even china will soon ban hex chrome process, by proxy if not explicitly.
Infrastructure, price of electricity, political stability, availability of cheap land.
why is this so difficult for you to imagine?
i mean, i'm pretty sure i know why, but ask yourself.
The fully automated shoemaking machine could be placed anywhere the raw materials could be shipped.
i agree, there's no way on earth any chinese firm could have the best shoe-making robot plant in 20 years. we all know chinese people aren't smart enough for that.
And this will leave more time for people to spend with each other instead of in drudgery,
This assumes that those increased profits from the increased productivity would end up in the hands of the lower-class laborers. What makes you think this would happen?
Believing this does not require belief in the goodness of people nor some abstruse economic theory+, just look at the examples of history.
+I love such economics but must admit its predictive power has been poor.
Going back further Augustus was actually wealthier than the government.
So your competitors are also able to automate the supply chain. So you have to too. To be competitive.
Therefore all of the people doing backend tasks with spreadsheets and 'copy/paste' of addresses, sku codes etc. get to be made redundant. The computer does most of it with the process being customer driven as much as possible.
However this is not where the story ends. To be competitive in this new online marketplace where reviews are everything, there is a new requirement for skilled customer service agents, able to do the things that were not automated, i.e. the things that need customer interaction, product knowledge and skill. There is a need for the language support, e.g. French/German/Italian/Spanish/Portuguese and more if selling into the E.U.
So now instead of having a room full of data entry people doing dull work there is now a room full of people doing thinking person work, where skill and independent thought is helpful.
These new staff need to be treated differently, they can't be hired and fired ad-hoc, they need to be paid properly and given opportunities to grow with the company.
Because you now have intelligent staff it is also possible to involve them in more things, so being able to compete in foreign language markets becomes much more possible as there is now in-house translation facilities from someone customer focused and with product knowledge.
When speaking with customers the 'intelligent human agents' will have a more insightful interaction, so less 'lonely' than when everything was manual and not automated. The agents will essentially be dealing with new edge cases, not routine interactions, e.g. to get address details from a customer.
Because the 'intelligent customer service agents' are creating value they are not a cost in the way the previous 'data entry agents' were.
It is not all doom and gloom, there will be winning companies that will thrive by putting the customer first and hiring better people that are paid better.
In that case the decoupling seems to have happened around 1990.
The healthcare cost explosion in the US seems to be a whole other phenomenon which it's hard to get a handle on.
I've noticed that the "decoupling" in your UK chart roughly coincides with the creation of the EU which allowed cheap Eastern European laborers to come in which potentially had a similar impact to the illegal immigration in the US. Though I'm less confident of that since I'm not as familiar with economic changes in the UK over that time period.
Productivity and wages are still related, it's just that productivity is not the only variable.
Just to complete the story, there is no consumer because nobody has a job, so there's no reason to create consumer goods in the first place.
This all feels like we're sleepwalking into a nightmarish hell far beyond A Brave New World or 1984. Amazon, drones, mass surveillance, erosion of privacy. The day will come when we no longer can opt out.
That day already came a long time ago. Even those of us who do everything we can to avoid the surveillance end up being sold out (often inadvertently) by those we know when they share information about us or have their contact lists harvested. That's without even getting into the data Google/Facebook/Amazon/etc collect from public records, credit card companies, etc.
Try think better and further!
I've said (half-jokingly) to my friends that in the future, recommendation systems will know so much about us and be so accurate that we won't even need to make many purchasing decisions anymore. They will make the decisions that we would have made anyway.
18 weeks? Stuff that. The sneakers will be printed on demand at a local fab and delivered by drone within the hour.
It does however have some really pretty vaporwave illustrations so I guess there's that in its favor. I'd listen to an album that had most of those drawings as the cover art.
Moreover, the kinds of "self driving vehicle" software it is predicting are kind of assuming a new kind of software that doesn't have bugs (what happens on your unmanned container ship when something goes awry?).
Where the Author says Lonely, I say Wonderful....
The less interaction I have with people to get the things I need/want the better.
The day I can have all my food, groceries, and Computer parts delivered by Drone after ordering them on my phone is a day I will be happy.
I prefer shopping offline, to have more excuses to get out, not fewer. (Within reason of course, some stores/experiences really are worth avoiding.)
Interactions with humans just generally leaves me frustrated and annoyed
I have no desire to talk with, or interact with someone while buying my apples or onions. In fact I shop at larger big box stores specifically because the employees are in different and do not attempt to engage with me. I want to get what I need and get out in the most efficient manner possible, small talk and inane banter waste time.