Canadian open data portal
open.canada.ca
open.canada.ca
And so the US reduces its voice and influence in yet another area. One example will be that citations of US data will decline; being reminded less and less of US data, researchers and similar will tend not to look for it in the first place.
Quick reference article: https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/4w578d/the-harper-governm...
I also understand that the science censorship issues in Canada have begun to swing back the other way, but I'm not sure if that's because of their current administration or if it began before that.
For example, fire stations in Canada has 35 'thumbs up' but no actual data available (http://open.canada.ca/en/search/inventory/reference/tcod-201...)
Keep in mind, the language used is to make the information as accessible as possible to the largest possible range of interested parties. So if you're to ask why such an inventory exists, the answer would be that any number of differing purposes exist for any number of potential inquiries. IE—not everybody who wants information from this kind of database is an engineer or scientist.
If you're really interested, you can pull down the csv data set and sort by date released.
I wonder if Canadian or any other government has a similar vision.
http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/geography/topographic-...
> Last week the Canadian finance ministers announced that federal, provincial, and territorial governments will require companies to keep information on beneficial owners that can be made available to authorities. In the same week, all 28 EU members agreed to make such information publicly available on registries and to make beneficial owners of trusts available to authorities.
Source: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/how-much-real-estate...
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>400 Bad Request</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Bad Request</h1>
<p>Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.<br />
Request header field is missing ':' separator.<br />
<pre>
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chro</pre>
</p>
</body></html>
A broken request parser? What a lovely first impression.