Hacker News Reader

Comment by greentrust | Hacker News Reader

A hypothetical – since flights are relatively expensive, people usually just go for the cheapest option, so airlines race to the bottom and lose profits. With autonomous vehicles the cost of a ride will be very inexpensive–a few dollars probably–so consumers may focus less on cost in favor of brand loyalty, cool cars, etc, leaving room for providers upsell certain services and profit (turning a $4 ride into a $5 isn't a bad profit margin)

View on HN

I’m sure they will try to hide that by offering subscriptions, loyalty cards, better chairs, larger cars, larger monitors, Netflix, faster rides, etc, but the competition will go wherever the demand is and offer that $5 ride for $4.50.

I’m not sure how well they will be able to diversify their product while keeping the economies of scale. If 10% of your customers is willing to pay for more leg space, can you get by with 10% of your fleet being larger cars, or does that affect the waiting times of that 10% too much, and do you need to make most of your cars larger?

Also, if you pay $1 extra per trip on your commute, that’s a nice smartphone each year.

You would travel in reduced comfort for a year, however small the difference, to get the latest samsung/iphone?

Why not?

Or, perhaps you have a small frame and the difference in leg room wouldn't impact you at all.

I didn’t say that I would, nor that it would be “however small the difference”; I claim some people would. I also think that, if Uber and Lyft manage to capture the lower-income market, many of their customers will.

Also one man’s “reduced comfort” is another man’s “less luxury”. People make those choices all the times, e.g. when buying cars, train tickets, housing, or food.

I know I will. I’m not going to ride in the Crapton Expresss.

I’ll gladly ride in the crapton express. It’s more important to save money on frequent purchases than rare large ones.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com