There is a big story here that is not being told, alluded to in one paragraph of the parent article. "[R]eplacing the decades-old VistA medical record system."
VistA used to be the VA's electronic health record system. It is open source. It used to be maintained by the VA IT people with a host of third-party plugins. The name of the part physicians interacted with is CPRS or VA-CPRS. It has a good track record in improving prescribing accuracy.[1] It's cheap. [1] It's tops in physician satisfaction, for several years. [2] It definitely needs maintenance, and isn't getting it any more. Third party vendors have stopped producing for it, too. A big proximate cause: they're ditching the whole system to outsource to Cerner. Cerner makes a not-very-popular electronic health record system. Cerner did make more corporate donations to Republicans than Epic, the biggest EHR provider in the US. [3] Now, Cerner was already working for the DoD and there is some effort to harmonize systems, so it made sense in some practical ways, but it was a no-bid process. Spending close to $10 billion of taxpayer money without any bidding process... ugh. The lawsuit about that has been dismissed, though.[4]
Jared Kushner was pretty proud that the VA chose "in two weeks" to go with Cerner and ditch open-source VistA. [5]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VistA
[2] https://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/public/ehr2016#p...
[3] http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/see-what-top-ehr-vendor...
[4] https://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2017/10/24/judge...
[5] https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/healthcare-information...