In Malaysia, Nutritionists Take Money from Food Giants
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
* Street food is very tasty, but often laden with gular (palm sugar) or rock sugar (case in point: Sambal). You don't notice because it's spicy!
* Sweet drinks (milo, teh tarik) often accompany the spicy food.
* The street food is so cheap, and available pretty much everywhere. People avoid cooking at home[1]. Fresh fruit and vegetables are not that cheap.
* Because the weather is so hot and humid, people avoid walking.
* People like to eat white rice, as opposed to brown rice (high GI)
* Society has transitioned to office work rather than manual work
* People can afford larger portions because they are wealthier
* The weather is hot and humid, so people avoid walking outside during the day! AC office to AC car to AC shopping mall, etc, etc.
[1] One fascinating thing I have noticed is the concept of a "wet" and "dry" kitchen. The dry kitchen is inside the house, and is almost a show-piece. The wet kitchen is where the real action happens (albeit by the maid), but is typically a lean-to adjoining the back of the house.
People like to eat white rice, because they've been doing so for thousands of years with no ill-effects. The question is how can we improve nutrition education in the west so that people don't think that they are going to get diabetes from eating rice.
As pointed out, human society is wealthier and we're eating more white rice than ever. Since its considered 'superior' to other cereals, we eat it to the exclusion of other cereals. In Japan, for instance, eating too much white rice almost sank the Japanese navy [1]
[1] - https://medium.com/war-is-boring/eating-too-much-rice-almost...
Just because everybody's been stuffing themselves with over processed bread, donuts and fries and have gotten obese doesn't imply that carbs are evil point blank and you must never eat them. That's just insane.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the atlantic and in the rest of the world, people in France eat their baguette everyday, Italians eat pizza and pasta all the time, most of the Asian continent lives on white rice every meal, etc..., and these are among the thinnest populations you will find.
How this argument is never considered is beyond me.
But as societies change, manual labour is replaced by machines and people move on to physically less demanding work, diets have to adapt.
Cup of cooked white rice: 205 calories.
Single cup of milo and milk: 100+ calories for milo, 100+ calories for milk.
So they're about the same in energy, however that is not the whole story. Firstly, the glycemic index[0] or how fast sugars are released - rice is good (low and sustained energy release) whereas Milo is bad (fast). Secondly, the overall eating habits encouraged... Milo is encouraging time-poor, less considered, more commercial/productised single-serving consumption and provides little additional nutrition, whereas rice typically accompanies and encourages more natural foods with a more complete nutritional profile (not just "massive energy hit plus incidental protein"). Obviously the environmental overheads with respect to packaging and transport are also far worse for Milo than rice.
First the amounts of sugar and carbohydrates like white rice is completly devastating. There is very little alternative like fresh fruits or protein in diet.
Milk is pretty bad and not tasty - usually low lactosis milk. There is no real cheese or real, good yoghurt etc. Food is of poor quality mostly - think junk food rather then freshly made and freshly cooked. It is tasty due to spice and sugar but not something you would like eating daily.
But more devastating then the diet is the lifestyle - due to climate mostly. There is very lityle outdoor activity in cities like KL - in this climate jogging, cycling or even walks in the park are out of question for most people.
Malaysia also has sub-par 3rd World city infrastructure - cars rule the cities and the pavements are terrible and dangerous to walk.
On the streets one can see a lot of Malayi people who due to lack of activity and carbohydrates intake are overweight and with symptoms of type II diabetes.
It is quite suprising that not that far North in Thailand - addmitedly better climate - cycling is as popular as in Italy and people exercise much more outdoors and look healthier.
I love Malaysia and they are sweet people there. Just it is a difficult place for me regarding sugar intake and lack of outdoor activity.
But the fruits are amazing! There is so much variety of tropical fruits! But my comments about the pricing were based on my observations at the supermarkets -- it felt like the costs were quite high for fresh fruit & veg compared to simply eating out.
[1] Shout out to Klang Bah Kuh Teh. It's been my first stop many times once I've arrived in M'sia!
I have pretty much enjoyed the food but it just isn't the kind of diet that you would recommend to anyone for health and and loosing weight.
Penang is a little better then KL because of more food diversity there and some really nice Indian, vegetarian restaurants. And the climate is also better then KL so there is more people jogging along the waterfront. But still it isn't a good city for biking.
Well, malted drinks are a staple in South Asia. In India the brand called Cadbury Bournvita is the go to food for most mothers. As if the added sugar is not enough, quite a lot of parents tend to add 1-2 additional spoons of sugar. Then there is Horlicks by GSK. Milo is way behind.
The company said its review of the article on the breakfast study and other research was intended “to ensure that the methodology was scientifically correct.”
What kind of standards, practices and internal controls do these guys have to ensure scientific correctness of a paper?
If your research is funded by NSF, the articles you published are still peer-reviewed, not reviewed by the NSF.
http://www.vocativ.com/212533/big-tobacco-doctors/index.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4778168/US-doctors...