But that's the problem in reading an English translation of a 2000-yr old text. Too many handlers have intervened, one must assume the purity of the original has been compromised.
...one must assume the purity of the original has been compromised.
One must also assume the original had any purity to be compromised.
As has been said a few different ways: it's all in the translations.....I was indoctrinated with the King James Version, you know, the one that is 100 % accurate, up to knowing which books to leave out after the council of Nicaea... So in that light, the quote is correct :)