People might conclude the same thing, since more crimes are committed by males than females. Are you saying it's unfair because an innocent male could become a suspect by virtue of only being male? Or for a more subtle reason?

Statistics have been consistent in reporting that men commit more criminal acts than women.[1][2] Self-reported delinquent acts are also higher for men than women across many different actions.[3] Burton, et al. (1998) found that low levels of self control are associated with criminal activity.[4] Many professionals have offered explanations for this sex difference. Some differing explanations include men's evolutionary tendency toward risk and violent behavior, sex differences in activity, social support, and gender inequality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_crime

OP wants an open sourced, data-based statistical model of where crime might occur (methodological flaws and all), and not an unasked-for politicized preaching about the supposed virtues of a subset of people over another subset of people.

Or worse, it might actually mention out loud that white collar crime kills more people and costs far more money to society every year than street crime, and mention that white collar crime is completely normalized and not even seen as deviant within upper class communities. What are you supposed to do then? Actually arrest the rich for the harm they do?

Reductio ad absurdum of the bias argument (-:

It would be right.