What are currently the best tech buzzwords that might convince people you have magic pixie dust for sale?
blockchain
I suspect based on the image he meant DARE: https://doubaibai.github.io/DARE/
Which is somewhat less than impressive. The quoted "accuracy" is AUC which weighs all errors the same. It is also not a binary detector. For use in courtroom false positives are much more costly.
Remember this also says nothing about generalization power of the system. Nor how well humans could be trained to detect lies. (Untrained results were pretty impressive.)
Very overblown claims as of now.
Paul Ekman [0] is "ranked 59th out of the 100 most cited psychologists of the twentieth century" and I thought the TV show based on his research [1] was very entertaining. (I am surprised that the article used the phrase "micro-expression" without any reference to Ekman's work.)
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Ekman [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_to_Me
Specifically, comments should encourage discussion and allow for multiple perspectives on topic. It appears to me that your comment is borderline name calling and is anything but constructive.
Or, I guess there may be a distinction between "it is good to, for every thing, to be skeptical of that thing" and "for every thing, it is good to be skeptical of that thing".
I consider the statement that "for every statement, it is good to be skeptical of that statement, regardless of what other statements that one is or is not skeptical of" to be doubtful.
It seems fairly clear that skepticism which is directed in a specific way can be harmful?
I will put this on a plaque. It is unfortunately not a popular opinion.