Bottled Water
onlineeducation.net
onlineeducation.net
Water Jug coolers simply don't cut it, even filled with ice cubes you'll only get until noon. I freeze 3 bottles of water, use ice packs and still my water can start getting warm on a hot sunny day.
Since I moved to an apartment building our water has actually been of good enough quality to filter. Where I used to live the water had an acrid taste, even filtered, and when we had a municipal waterline break it only made it worse (note because we had bottle water, we weren't all that concerned when we didn't have water for two days).
I use a bottle for a work week, refilling it with filtered water. I buy it for at most $3 (got it down to $2 before) a case containing ~4.6 gallons (35 x 500ml) and it's spring not municipal. Here in Canada it has to provide the source, has mineral contents on the label (my tap doesn't!) and as for meeting e.coli tests I find it rather moot considering the water is ozonated, and it's there whenever my water supply is down.
The facts about bottled water, for me, is that it enables me to stay hydrated (and cooler) during a day without dying from dehydration, it can be stored at ambient temperatures for well over a year, it's of a far better quality than my bare municipal supply, doesn't contain insane amounts of fluoride (or any) and supplies the mineral contents. Most importantly of all (for some people I know who are affected by this in Hamilton) it doesn't even contain trace amounts of lead or mercury, and considering the Hamilton region is considering changing the makeup of their municipal water so that it doesn't leach lead from piping rather than remove the lead pipes!
I'm sorry, I'm not comfortable with the idea of drinking or even showering in leaded water. Despite lead absorption through skin being rare, I think when it's covering your entire body it's present at some rate.
Sorry, bottled water is just fine for me. The reason I filter water is because it's economically prudent and for all I can tell (where I am at least) it tastes the same. Not buying 3 cases of water a week saves me roughly $450 in a year, which can be spent wherever I want from buying that $100 bottle of scotch to buying video games or whatever, I could even use that $450 to take the better part of a week off and who knows, plant a tree to save the environment or some other crap. There's far better ways to save the planet than to worry about bottled water, you know by renovating power plants, building nuclear + green, subsidizing improvements to home insulation levels. Offer subsidies to people who buy high-efficiency appliances, like washing machines (generally the most expensive appliance to run in any house) and dryers.
I work outside in 40C heat, in the sun for 8-10 hours a day;
The record high temperature in Hamilton is 38.8C, and the average high during the summer is 27.3C. I'm sorry, I'm not comfortable with the idea of drinking or even
showering in leaded water. Despite lead absorption through skin
being rare, I think when it's covering your entire body it's
present at some rate.
Then either filter your well water (the municipal water is fine):http://www.hamilton.ca/HealthandSocialServices/PublicHealth/...
Or replace the lead pipes in your building:
http://www.hamilton.ca/CityDepartments/PublicWorks/WaterAndW...
The city of Hamilton has been doing a large campaign for the past few months (until everyone got distracted by where to put the tigercats stadium and no one cares about lead in the water anymore) on how to deal with lead in the supply lines to many houses, and have currently got no plan on what to do. They're considering changing the makeup of the water so that it doesn't leach lead out of the existing lines (note the levels of lead are upon entering the system are safe, not necessarily exiting the system). There's a big concern, because a lot of houses only have about 2ft of exposed lead piping, normally well concealed, for the homeowner to know they have a lead supply line or not.
They're currently offering a $2000 loan to cover the cost of replacing your private lines (on the inside of your house) which is woefully insufficient to say the city provided the original supply lines, and then they'll cover the work to replace the private line that connects to the municipal line (IE everything outside of your house, much of which is well below city property in the downtown areas this concerns).
Please don't try to pick apart my comment, this isn't reddit.
I don't understand this at all. Why can't you freeze a bunch of reusable bottles with tap water? Are you saying that the thermal properties of tap water differ significantly from those of bottled water?
it doesn't even contain trace amounts of lead or mercury
How do you know that? Did you hire an independent testing lab to verify that?
To the former, as you obviously read enough of my comment, I stated I fill the bottles on average 4 times a week (new bottles monday used until friday) with filtered water. Tap water here tastes disgusting and has huge amounts of chlorine, and in areas the municipal and house lines contain lead or are made of lead.
Interesting. I didn't know that the Canadian government is responsible for claims made on label packaging.
Tap water here tastes disgusting and has huge amounts of chlorine, and in areas the municipal and house lines contain lead or are made of lead.
Ah, thanks for explaining. Your comment was filled with so much unnecessary detail that I failed to connect the dots. I imagine that you could replace most of it with just this sentence.
Another reason is that soft drink bottlers in the US don't claim that they're using "natural" spring water when they're just using municipal water supplies. That lack of deception might explain some of the difference.
Finally, some of the bottled water hatred is specifically focused on Fiji water. Soft drinks tend to be bottled locally whereas Fiji water is shipped to the US from an island in the Pacific controlled by a dictatorial regime. The idea of shipping water across the planet because idiots are easily seduced by a glossy marketing campaign rankles some.
Coca-cola tried that municipal/tap water scam in the UK, but ended up having their product pulled from the shelves because it was contaminated with bromate. After that happened, they completely pulled the brand from the UK.
There's the other side of the local argument. Soft drink manufacturers tend to source the water locally, so you get reports of bottling plants competing with local farmers by draining water from aquifers in poor countries.
Anyway, I agree with all you have said, but I still think soft drinks are the worse of the two. They screw up peoples' health.
I think we totally agree.
You need not guess; I propose some explanations later in the comments: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1593158
I don't know why they can't target more realistic goals.
Who is they? And do "they" matter?
Making people feel bad about satisfying the basic human need of hydration is really stupid.
How do you know the desired goal is making people feel bad rather than informing them? Actions have consequences. Surely you don't think that everyone should be shielded from learning about the consequences of their actions in general?
What does this gain you? The main advantage is that you remove the fluoride. America is insane for fluoridating her water supply. Intentionally adding poison to the water, using dental care as the excuse. Sorry, but medicating the entire population is just stupid. There is no way to monitor dosage.
Low-dosage flouride in a water supply has been shown over and over again in epidemiological studies to reduce the incidence of oral cavities from 15-40%. There have been no reputable studies to show that there are dangers to this low dose.
http://www.city.milwaukee.gov/water/about/WaterQuality.htm
For 2009, the highest fluoride levels were 2.06 mg/L and the median level was 0.77 mg/L. So there's at least one data point.
That alone is reason for them to buy bottled water but I'll add your fluoride facts to my conversations in the future.
11,400 average distance in miles driven per year in the US (in 1994 anyway) http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/rtecs/chapter3.html
11,400 miles / (17 barrels or 340 gallons) = 33.5 mpg
You can reasonably expect to get better than that in a hybrid. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/hybrid_sbs.shtml
Sure, you Americans are insane for buying uncarbonated water in bottles, who would do shit like that? I, however, don’t like and don’t drink uncarbonated water. Whenever I drink water it has to be carbonated (which isn’t all that great because the tap water quality in my region is actually pretty awesome — miles ahead pretty much anything you could get in bottles, especially the cheap stuff). Oh, sure, there are these gizmos that let you carbonate your tap water but it just doesn’t taste the same. I tried pretty much every brand.
See, I promised you a half-assed excuse.