Everything You Need to Know About Why Net Neutrality Is a Terrible Idea
dailywire.com
dailywire.com
There's no argument here, just a complaint that Google is huge which, while probably valid, seems irrelevant.
I'm not for Title II network neutrality. I think it will be used in inappropriate ways, as tends to happen with poorly understood laws.
I think it is easier to add network neutrality requirement than it is to roll them back, so I would favor moving slowly and deliberately with legislation explicitly crafted for modern technology in mind.
I think I could support a limited network neutrality, but I want companies to have the ability to shape traffic, have different billing strategies, etc.
One of the things that gets me is that those supporting NN are the same that supported a la carte billing for cable, two things that seem clearly at odds with each other.
@king_phil you are helping to legitimize this claim made by @jnordwick
btw. in germany DE-CIX is one of the biggest internet exchanges around the world. but somehow the big ISPs only peer with it, with a really really low margin, only because they make ton of money with private peerings.
Im not from the USA and do not have a detailed understanding of what 'Net Neutrality' means for you in terms of laws and practice. For me it seams quite sober to separate T1's and T2's peering with each other and data-centers vs T3's censoring end users by capping access to selected services. If anyone could clarify the 'scope' of Net Neutrality as the term is used in the US press that would be greatly helpfull.
I believe it is intentionally kept vague, such that people who do not support the agenda of Google/Facebook/Amazon may be labeled as "anti Net Neutrality", which simply sounds bad.