I know that in some journals it is good some of the time. But yeah, didn't mean to imply thats always good.
Maybe we should introduce a process of reviewing the reviews, and some incentives accordingly. Not sure how to do that.
An example - as a 1st year grad student, I had to review a number of articles in 'top-ranked' journals, just because my supervisor preferred to dump it on me rather than bother to do it himself...