Hacker News Reader

That dataset is limited, it’s vast and accurate for around 100 years then the quality and data points drop exponentially the further back you look.

Plenty of people agree that there is not enough data to draw conclusions about such a complex issue. Way to make this political for no reason.

View on HN

It's an inherently political issue, one that has pretty clear cut lines. I'll give you a dollar if you can guess which side of the line has more funding from oil companies and other vested interests.

Can you imagine why that particular line might be the one espousing climate change denial and skepticism, uniquely in the developed world, whilst simultaneously preparing for it?

Should you not be skeptical of where your skepticism comes from?

> Plenty of people agree that there is not enough data to draw conclusions

What people, climate scientists?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com