As for the stand I used this cheap ikea-hack: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/c7/c9/a0/c7c9a072c328a3596186e1b71... (can't find the original post sry)
As for the stand I used this cheap ikea-hack: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/c7/c9/a0/c7c9a072c328a3596186e1b71... (can't find the original post sry)
It would be easy to create a giant mirror of GitHub, for example (once you have a distributed storage system).
Also, GitHub doesn't control what users are viewing (unlike YouTube and Facebook), which makes the platform less of a threat to internet freedom.
So they added a button to dump all issues and PRs without messing with the API?
In comparison, GitHub offers a simple clone button (among ways) which gives you everything.
I mean I get your argument but op isn’t wrong. YouTube is reallly easy to rip content from.
2. Google can block it any moment, or inject ads.
3. You don't get the original data, but a transcoded version. And/or a watermarked version.
In contrast, GitHub is intended to download data from, so above points will never apply.
> to get one's data (or someone else's!) out
Google/takeout does not apply to someone else's data.
Wall of shame? :-)
I wouldn't go as far as to say that…websites are lost every day without an archive of them being taken.
That way, it would be easy for archive.org and other parties to build a scraper that just takes snapshots of all repos every once in a while, for posterity.