Show HN: AssassinationFiles.net – JFK Declassified Document Search
assassinationfiles.net
assassinationfiles.net
Without giving too much away, it's not about the assassination. It's about JFK's actual record, which calls into question the whole enterprise of liberal hero-worship and destroys the basis upon which most CIA conspiracy theories are premised. There is no motive for the CIA to assassinate JFK. Vietnam was his war, he was a fanatical supporter of terrorism, and brought us closer to nuclear war than any other president.
[1] https://zcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/zbooks/htdocs/chomsky/r...
That strikes me as odd given the amount of circumstancial evidences pointing in the conspiracy direction.
Also the lone gunman who kills single handily the president of the most powerful nation in the world:
- would not admit it (why not if he is a crazy guy killing for political reasons?) - and is killed right after by a mafia linked guy
This guy is executed right after being questioned by the police and denying any role in the assassination and pretending he’s a patsy. And it’s not a conspiracy?
You say "the lone gunman who kills single handily the president of the most powerful nation in the world" - it is like an act of such magnitude must have a bigger and deeper explanation than just a half-crazy guy with a gun and unclear motives.
But if you have a clear line of sight it is not harder to kill the president of the most powerful nation in the nation of the world, than it is to kill any other random person on the street. And you don't really need a better motive to it either. And it is not weird to deny a crime when apprehended. Certainly the Ruby assassination was weird and unfortunate, but how does it actually point to a conspiracy? It seems rather random.
> You must also ask yourself: why, after all these years, is a substantial quantity of government info still secret? So secret that 'swamp drainer' Trump won't declassify it?
1) Because he's not a swamp drainer, he's a swamp monster.
2) He didn't declassify these documents, time did.
3) Because the vast majority of intelligence data is secret (for a substantial amount of time), regardless of motive.
5) The fact that the Warren Commission Report was a fabrication would be clear to everyone.
6) Some other illegal government action would be exposed, like the Bay of Pigs, or the Gulf of Tonkin 'attack', the 'Lusitania is not carrying arms for England', and/or other government lies.
7) < you get the idea >
---- I find the small-minded among us (who down-vote when they do not like what is said) should really re-read HN Rules. Thank you.
I suspect the downvote is from a politician who is vested in having the "LHO killed JFK" inaccurate meme continue to proliferate. Fess up! ;-)
Even a cursory glance of the single bullet theory doesn't pass a sniff test. (a single bullet that bounces around the bodies of two different people, and comes out in pristine condition.)
Regarding how Jack Ruby points to a conspiracy. Mr. Ruby said it himself. [0]
If you'd like to challenge your theories and add to your known evidence, I'd recommend the documentary series "The men who killed Kennedy". It was done by the History Channel back when the History channel was focused on history and is full of first hand accounts from people involved at the time.
I believe parts 7,8,9 are not allowed to be sold anymore due to a lawsuit filed by LBJ's estate, but they are still available on youtube.
Probably just a kook. But you can't make this stuff up.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-101...
Of course. This was nothing more than a completely absurd bit of theater put on to throw meat to His tinfoil hat wearing, Alex Jones watching base of supporters.
Consider that even what people believe to be carefully anonymized data sets can be reverse-engineered down to a scarily specific group of people, if not all the way down to the specific person individually. [0] [1]
Aside from the fact that some people have a conveniently weak definition of "anonymous", this is part of why it's worrisome to have so many people collecting and reselling browsing data and other types of user analytics, despite their repeated assertions of anonymity.
It's perfectly plausible to believe that with the right shuffle of declassified data, substantial new information will become apparent.
Even if you believe that such first-order evidence didn't exist, bureaucracies generate massive amounts of second-order evidence that's hard to erase. For example, if you believe that the conspiracy selected Oswald as a fall guy, you have to ask how; and the simplest way of doing that would be to send someone down to the records archive and search for a good one... which would be noted as someone accessing the records [1].
This is the problem with conspiracy theories: to explain the lack of evidence, they have to expand the conspiracy to be able to erase that evidence, which generates more evidence that needs to be erased.
[1] I don't know if such accesses were logged back then, but I'd be surprised if they weren't.
The punishment for the former would be execution, the latter resulted in a simple resignation.
Speaking of 18-minute-gaps: https://www.forensicmag.com/article/2011/02/cracking-waterga...
These guys say 'nothing particularly special' was in the gap: https://nypost.com/2014/08/03/after-40-years-john-dean-re-ex...
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_White_House_tapes
From "Stratfor Glossary of Useful, Baffling and Strange Intelligence Terms"
https://wikileaks.org/IMG/pdf/The_Stratfor_Glossary_of_Usefu...
Is this legit?
While it wasn't anything significant to others, it was a neat bit of family history for me.
In case anybody was interested, my relative wasn't investigated because of a link to Jack Ruby after all, but he was mentioned by other informants.
Two questions:
What sort OCR stack did you use?
Is there a way to see the text inside the search results? I'm only seeing the PDFs themselves and would love to do some full text searches of my own!
Imagemagick -> tesseract -> solr/lucene
I am a neophyte when it comes to this stuff, so I'm sure someone with more experience could get better results from tweaking IM/tess. Some of the IM convert stuff was extremely memory intensive on larger documents and AWS was starting to get really expensive. Later on I added PDFbox to split the PDFs pre IM and run a page at a time vs. the entire document.
SOLR has a highlighting feature that I never really got working right. That would have showed some context to the search terms in the results.
Some random searches brought me to this: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-101...
It seems to be a summary on a special agent operating in the 60s and gives some interesting glimpses into his life/tasks.
https://assassinationfiles.net/script/search.php?searchterms...
https://assassinationfiles.net/script/search.php?searchterms...
1 July 1947
Enclosed herewith are translations from the official gestapo files of a list of persons connected with the work of the Third International in China. These files are in possession of Turin, NY and he is combing through them extracting this type of information which will be forwarded to you as it is obtained.
I guess it's not super surprising that US intelligence was interested in the results of Gestapo intelligence on communists in other countries, but it does make me incredibly, incredibly uncomfortable.
Some of the Gestapo notes identify various people as "US citizen, Jew," "German citizen, Jewess," etc.
(On the technical side - is the OCR'd text available, or only searchable?)
I mean, I guess at some level I always knew the answer was yes, but this is pretty blatant.
The image quality is too poor for me to spend the time to figure out what all the text and annotation is saying. It looks like it's something like a summary of major leaders of the Chinese branch of the Comintern with supporting documentation, but I'm not entirely certain.
A few people have asked about the text, so once the 11/03 release is complete in the next couple of days, I should be able to upload it to github. I'm sure that someone who is really familiar with image manipulation/cleanup could produce a better text index.
1. Change the name. Assassination Files is sensationalistic, which always feels manipulative to me and raises my doubts about the author's intentions. These days, with so much trolling and propaganda, I assume that anyone who adopts sensationalistic practices doesn't understand and/or respect the issues of integrity on the Internet and is not to be taken too seriously.
2. I'm not sure many others feel this way, but I need a reason to believe the website contains a correct, complete, and fully searchable record of the released documents. I don't know if the author has an axe to grind, and perhaps omits or fails to properly OCR or index certain documents, or if there are errors due to the unknown error rate - and not knowing the site's producer, I have no idea if that error rate is high or low. If someone with expertise, such as a professor in that field, could vouch for it, that would help - but perhaps that's outside the scope.
Thank you!
when talking about actual files pertaining to an actual assassination (noone debates asssasination I dont think here)? what should they be called instead?
'the recently released information possibly tangentially related to the events leading to the transition of the 35th and 36th us presidency'?
I went back and forth about the title, but my girlfriend gave the OK, so I went with it. :)
You are generous to give the world the benefit of your project, and for free. I wrote the feedback because that's what Ask HN is for, but overall IMHO it's awesome that you did it.
Definitely, it's better to listen to your S.O.'s feedback than to strangers on HN - most of us can't even get a date.