In another of your comments, you claim to be a fan of GCBC. I find it difficult to believe you are a "fan" of GCBC when you are apparently unaware of the tens of pages of citations it has in the back of it. I am not making up that number. And yes, it cites the studies that are not in its "favor" and discusses them too.

Your comment is basically "You're being too informative. Could you break it down for me further, again, one more time?" Seriously, no. People have already summarized it endlessly, ask Google about it, or even just poke around this thread a bit. If you want the full effect, go buy it and read it. (That's targeted at everybody reading this, not just you personally KirinDave.)