Hacker News Reader

Comment by echelon | Hacker News Reader

Absolutely not. Why would I offer to build someone else's castle without reward?

I'll gladly contribute to something everyone owns and has rights to, but under no circumstances will I do this for complete strangers that seek to capitalize upon my efforts. I only do that in exchange for a salary.

View on HN

Would you then also not contribute to Reddit? You are also contributing content to their website that they then use to serve other people ads. There is also Reddit Gold that you can buy to unlock some perks.

The idea is the same for this website. Although we don't want to serve other people ads as we think there are better business models than that.

Reddit (and others eg; Stackoverflow) has a reputation system. Basically, the incentive for contribution on those websites is to earn points of some kind.

The idea may be the same, but I don't see any point system mentioned for contributors here. So why contribute?

We will have a reputation system for users in the future.

As to why you may want to contribute. If you use the website and you find value in it, you can always make it better not only for yourself but for others. Only here, not only can you add links and resources but you can also directly add features and new things as the entire code base is Open Source and thus anyone can edit/fork and make what they want with it for all other people to enjoy.

I take it you don't use YouTube then. All their content is user generated, you get ads, they capitalize on your "efforts", and you have premium features that you can access only by paying (ie. YouTube Red).

YouTube creators get paid for their content. Further, funds from YouTube Red also in part go directly to creators because you are watching ad-free.

YouTube creators get paid if there are enough people watching them. People watching videos, discussing on comment threads, and paying for YouTube Red don't get paid for their effort.

As a side note, I’m not sure if you’re aware but you’re coming off very argumentative. People are trying to give you feedback and you’re arguing to change their minds. The only thing you’re succeeding at is looking like you’re no fun to work with. If you’re trying to build a community of contributors this is not a good look.

I agree with you. We apologise for this. We have indeed changed our mind and we do think it is best to focus on the community and curation of content.

We are just trying to find a way to financially support the project without bringing the website down due to not being able to afford to keep it up.

You're right. I apologize, I didn't want to come across as arrogant or defensive.

So, if your model is like YouTube and Reddit, it's fine. Just make it clear. They didn't collect donations like Patreon when they started.

Personally, I would rather "contribute" to Wikipedia than to YouTube.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com