Maloney Introduces Legislation to Block FCC Rollback of Net Neutrality
seanmaloney.house.gov
seanmaloney.house.gov
He's a Democrat. Democrats are a minority in the House of Representatives (193 Democrats vs. 239 Republicans), and Republicans have been very united in opposition to net neutrality. Getting rid of the 2015 rule is even part of the party platform adopted at the 2016 convention. It seems very unlikely that enough Republicans can be convinced to go against their party position and flip on this.
They would also draw the ire of President Trump, who is on the record as strongly opposing net neutrality. Not that he actually knows what net neutrality is [1]...
At best, Republicans might let this go to a vote, and allow up to about 20 Republicans from moderate states where Democrats might use net neutrality to flip seats vote in favor of it to help keep those seats Republican.
[1] Trump: ""Obama’s attack on the internet is another top down power grab. Net neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine. Will target conservative media." https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/53260835850816716...
I can at least applaud the fact that it puts the spotlight back on Congress, as opposed to the FCC. The FCC is a Republican regulatory agency. Like every regulatory agency, it's only minimally accountable to voters. The expectation that loud public outcry from Internet nerds would lead it to regulate like a Democratic agency is crazymaking.
Does it indicate all of them are corrupt? Because only corrupt shills oppose it willingly.
I'm not saying the two parties are even. Both are influenced by money, one probably significantly more than the other. But combined, it's probably more than 50%.
In the absence of activism, no; OTOH, there's an interaction between activism and a concrete legislative proposal to rally around; enough grassroots support in the districts of enough people who aren’t as strongly.committed to backing the anti-neutrality position as they are to their own re-election, and it could happen.
Moreover, even if it fails, the more attention that is drawn to it the more it helps raise the potential of net neutrality legislation being an platform issue in the 2018 elections; policy fights are rarely once-and-done battles, they are long wars, and some battles are more about preparing ground for the next battle than winning the war outright.
Of course if Congress does pass anything it all it's most likely to be a law to shield ISP from liability for not delivering the services their customers have paid for when they don't receive the kickbacks they want...
How do we make current broadband providers offer us modern internet services? Make them fear a world where they're competing with socialized last-mile infrastructure that doesn't need to make a profit.
An exception could exist for people who live on a gerrymandered district border or who are in the same state as a member seeking a state-wide office.
It's always better to call too.
The American body politic has been beyond repair for at least six years. The whole damned superstructure at the national level deserves to come tumbling down.
Whether or not Maloney's proposal makes it anywhere is beside the point, and concerning itself with that is a pedantic waste of time in smugness. I applaud Maloney for doing this precisely because how abundantly clear it makes the dysfunction, regulatory capture, and public interest disconnect.
It's a waste of time that could be better spent elsewhere. The only point of this is to make Maloney more marketable in the next election.
The fight to save Net Neutrality will benefit from high-visibility attempts to bring the issue to light.
The point is that political efforts that seem “obviously doomed to failure” sometimes turn out to win, because unexpected groundswells of support force people who would not have supported them in the conditions that seemed likely at the time the measure was introduced to reconsider, either on the merits or based on their own political self-interest.
This won't happen. But maybe it will look like it could've. Good move for Maloney. Meaningless for all of us.