But yes, sentences should be far shorter across the board.
But yes, sentences should be far shorter across the board.
Really? You'd say that cheating on emissions standards is worse than say beating someone over the head with a bat and robbing them?
Not to mention willfully flouting the law. They need to set a precedent.
[1]http://news.mit.edu/2017/volkswagen-emissions-premature-deat...
If someone has the power to poison a whole nation, with that power comes equal responsibility for their actions. If they act in good faith, we tend to forgive their mistakes, even if they have disastrous consequences. But there's no good faith here. We know he intended to poison them.
There is no serious ethical justification for considering a mugging to be worse. None has been presented here. We just naturally 'feel' that when the powerful commit crimes, these are mistakes (they are not). When the weak commit crimes, they need to be put in their place, because the weak and poor breaking the law is abhorrent to our neoliberal ideology -- the rich are supposed to assault the poor, this is just how things are. The opposite is unthinkable.