Your comment make no sense what so ever.

Number of haskellers in some particular company (despite your attempt at labeling it as "largest" without providing any evidence), do not prove or disprove quality of haskell.

Number of developers implying perfection of language is also easily disproved. PHP or JS are good examples, where original languages become popular because of other factors.

Also, original poster was trying to sell us single data point as measure of popularity O_O

Getting good quantitative informations about languages is hard. But claiming that X devs hired in some company implies poor quality but X+10 would imply good quality is just ridiculous.