He's talking specifically about OpenBSD base. Unless you can point to a rust binary in OpenBSD that Theo forgot about, he's not wrong.
i386 is relevant because OpenBSD supports i386.
i386 is relevant because OpenBSD supports i386.
No, he is very explicitly saying that
> There has been no attempt […] provide replacements for base POSIX utilities.
Which once again is categorically false, a github repository purporting to do exactly that has been provided.
> i386 is relevant because OpenBSD supports i386.
i386 is supported, the issue is compiling the compiler on i386.
which is required for the system to be self hosting
seriously - what is being said is this:
" oh hey lets throw away the functional and perfectly good entire base set of utilities for this 1/2 complete project on github using a language that doesn't even natively build on all of our supported platforms and wouldn't even remove the need for a C compliler in base, and further complicate the base toolchain, not to mention breaking all kinds of other builds which use shell utilities expecting certain behavior, etc ,etc, etc, because somone thought it would be 'neat' to do this. And whyyyy aren't you taking me serously??? "
every few days (hours?) some noobish person desides to ask some fantasy question about whatever topic of interest they are noobing about on openbsd (and other OS) discussion lists, and then gets whiny when they are being called out for being 'green' about life itself. this is another of those cases, and I have no idea why it got crossposted here or upvoted.
this sort of attitude is astoundingly hostile and toxic for an open source community to hold.
Now, that doesn't mean that a hostile rebuff is required or good policy, but random people who actually do not know what they are talking about, and haven't taken the time to learn enough to know what they're talking about, don't really deserve a long, in-depth, drawn out rebuttal or discussion.
You deliberately cut out the part which states he's talking about the ecosystem of OpenBSD, in an OpenBSD mailing list. That is an extremely disingenuous and uncharitable cherry-picked interpretation. He was categorically talking about efforts to port OpenBSD utilities to such a language and merge them into the project (i.e. the OpenBSD ecosystem). What you're suggesting he said is just plain FUD.