Why We Blame Millennials for Everything
citylab.com
citylab.com
https://gizmodo.com/5851062/generation-x-is-sick-of-your-bul...
;)
I'm serious. The Gen-Xers and Boomers didn't do it.
Except the quote does not originate from the ancient Greeks that is.
I read a lot of Plato in school, and even learned to read in Ancient Greek. It’s often funnier in Greek than in most translations.
It is true it does not follow. What the quote implies it is a very old issue.
They spoke about all the concepts of "hellicopter parenting", "kids being spoiled nowadays" etc. Then they go on to mention that literally every. single. generation that ever was written about since as far back as our records hold, was written about in the same way!
Yes, that's right, EVERY SINGLE GENERATION, since as far back as we have reporting, has been spoiled rotten, has no respect for elders, is entitled, and so on.
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/01/misbehaving-childre...
That said, the Greek dude had made some very astute observations of his own, that hold very well today. So it's not like "23 centuries" ago necessarily means an idea is stale or anything.
In Denmark where I’m from, municipalities have grouped together to build open source software as a response to a market which fails to deliver the products we want.
The industry response has been lobbying the government and trying everything in courts because it’s viewed as “job theft”. Well, not all industry, some companies have figured out software as a service, open APIs and agile corporation is where it’s at, but the big old dogs are playing the blame game.
In 10 years the old dogs won’t be around, because just like the diamond industry, they ran out of things people wanted to buy.
I mean, you can blame millennials all you want, but the most watched sporting event in 2017 was still the CSGO finals featuring a Danish team. You either adapt or you disappear because the people who are into your aged ways are only going to continue dying.
CSGO finals had about 3m https://www.dexerto.com/news/e-league-csgo-major-breaks-view...
The 2017 Superbowl as one example, had 114M. http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/06/media/super-bowl-ratings-pat...
The UEFA Champions League final in 2016 attracted 350 million global viewers.[1] I am supposing the 2017 event wasn't too much less than this.
The 2017 Indian Premier League (IPL) final had 324 million viewers according to one source.
[1] http://www.pennlive.com/sports/index.ssf/2017/02/super_bowl_...
[2] http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/19660717/billion-peop...
Beating the Olympics but likely not our national soccer team which I haven’t been able to find numbers on.
It had more than 90.000 viewers, or between 14 and 15% of the age group with 19% of the males in the age group watching.
I'm going to quantify the people whom I blame for everything as those with a net worth equal to or greater than an arbitrarily determined net worth of $10 million. If they're going to own everything, they need to take responsibility for everything--own it, in the colloquial sense, as well as the literal.
I am not suggesting that we "eat the rich", as it were. They seem to have some sort of brain-eating prion disease, and I don't want anyone else to catch it. Probably best that we just put down the ones that show symptoms, and burn the bodies.
As a class, they only number about 1.2 million. The rest of us are about 7.6 billion strong. We could take 'em. We know they don't know how to fight, because they always send young poor people to do it for them, and seem completely unfamiliar with self-sacrifice for the common good.
Why $10 million? Because that's "enough", in my opinion. You can retire on it, withdraw the "safe rate" of 3%, and live on this year's equivalent of $300k--which is 5 times the median household income--every year, forever (within a reasonable statistical confidence interval). You get too far ahead of that, and you start to lose touch with people who don't have "enough", at lower levels on the needs hierarchy. At that level, you still need to know how to play well with others, and not be a %%%%%% tyrant, in order to accomplish the great works that require large concentrations of capital. Above that, you start to grow less fearful of losing the trust of others.
If there is anything wrong with the Millennials, it's that they haven't yet applied their talent for killing off societal staples and institutions to quite the right people and practices. If you're a Millennial, think long and hard about your student loans and your healthcare coverage, and the people who made a conscious, calculated choice that you don't deserve to have nice things unless you serve, consume, and obey.
Put on the glasses. Just put on the f'ing glasses.
It's lazy and reductionist thinking that allows people to arbitrarily draw lines in whatever way they feel will best push their narrative.
Quick, 1981/1982[1] Millennial or X?
[1] Those born in 1981/1982 graduated in 2000
Although that is probably closer to the Oregon Trail Generation :-)
https://socialmediaweek.org/blog/2015/04/oregon-trail-genera...
Disclaimer: I have not read everything that's ever been written about millennials.
Marketing exists to sell stuff. Facts are only relevant to marketing in-so-far as the facts sells the product. More often than not, marketing is bullshit and completely devoid of facts because facts are boring and products need to be exciting.
"Millenials are killing X" is exactly the sort of marketing statement that is completely devoid of facts.
It's absurd to draw that equivalency, but good, bad, or indifferent, that is what society at large sees as the Millennial generation's only foray into public life.
I've noticed this tendency for people these days to just refuse to do work they don't like. They expect to be doing the interesting work that is reserved for people who have earned it. I tend to attribute this to millennial and their sense of entitlement. I've also seen some really driven millennials who get a lot of work done on their own initiative. I don't view them as typical millennials, but rather, as individuals who have rejected the entitled behavior of the standard millennial.
I don't know how true any of that is. I was born in '80, and my generation is entitled as shit. It just feels like, as we were realizing the lie of how entitled we were told to be, that the subsequent generation fell for even worse bullshit than we did.
Millenial behavior that seem wasteful like avocado toast are a type of premium mediocre consumption that they are not oblivious to. It is a dispirited but sincere effort to tell themselves and their parents (and perhaps society) that they are alright.
In truth, one generation's over optimism (not greed, as many say) causes the latter generation to be ill prepared. Neither side wants to admit this is an emergent systemic situation but rather would prefer to imagine it is controllable. Millenial's think it was something done to them. The other groups think millenials do it to themselves.
All the while the countries without these group labels are simply rolling with the punches and surviving day by day and getting smarter. The countries that have grown too accustomed to wealth due to incorrect human belief that exponential growth can continue infinitely are too busy suffering to figure out how to survive. They are getting dumber.
Once again a writer decides to try and project their personal opinions on to a subject they're* interviewing.
It works pretty well: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15844087
If that doesn't work, they can always blame immigrants, Islam or blacks.
Or it could be too many column inches to fill and not enough time to fill them with something insightful.
Yeah, probably conspiracy.
There doesn't need to be a conspiracy for GP to be basically correct. If you're a true believer in the free market, the market can never fail, it can only be failed.
Bad economy? It's the millennials. Not enough jobs? It's the foreign imports. Stagnant real wages? Blame illegal immigration.
Daring to question the efficiency of nearly unregulated capitalism is basically taboo in America.
The notion that there's an agenda behind any media beyond selling eyeballs is, of course, a harebrained conspiracy theory.
If you were to suggest that there is an agenda amongst the moneyed classes to keep corporate tax take low and restrictive regulation low then I would most heartily agree. There is overwhelming evidence that that is the case.
That there is a high level conspiracy to pit parent against child so everyone's too busy infighting? Extraordinary claims etc.
Perhaps the greatest unexpected result of the internet is how we dont need papers. Choice in what i read is mine.
Or maybe I'm being too pessimistic? Perhaps a little adversity will make them turn out better...
No, it's not. It's making broad generalizations on a huge group of people. It's like blaming all white people for discrimination or all black people for crime. It's wrong and discriminatory, and makes the assumption that everyone in that group is equally bad.
Instead of focusing on a certain age group, focus on the economic forces that gave boomers more opportunity than the younger generations. It's not the age group that's caused the issues, it's those forces.
No, this makes the assumption that all millennials would only vote for a millennial. That doesn't make sense. Millennials typically don't have as much political experience. Why would we vote for them?
Millennials don't need to be voted into office for their voice to be heard. That's the point of a republic, to elect representatives that reflect your _viewpoints_, not age.
Requires someone to be in Congress, not be a normal person on election day. Regular voters have very limited direct impact on specific pieces of legislation.
The growth of Chinese manufacturing is in large part a result of trade policies and our vast growing national debt's impact on currency's. Want long term growth? End deficit spending.
Our poor heath care system is again based on political choices.
The current drug policy and prison system is again an outgrowth of political choices.
Just look at all the collage students not busted for drugs. We have a long history of intentionally creating systemic issues.
I'm not saying that black people commit more crime because they're black. In fact, that's exactly the point I was trying to make: blaming black crime on their skin color is bad because it ignores the socioeconomic forces causing them to commit more crimes than other races with lower poverty levels. Just like how blaming boomers ignores the geopolitical and economic forces that gave them an advantage at the time. Not all black people commit crime, and not all boomers were privileged or lucky in life.
If you look annually their are ~17,000 reported murder and non-negligent manslaughter cases in the U.S. However, that excludes for example a significant subset of the ~32,000 traffic facilitates in the US that could be classified as Murder with slightly different laws. (Call it 1/4 from thin air and those murder statistics look different.) Importantly, they are generally both crimes, but while someone still ends up dead legally they are very different.
Another issue is if a factory kills thousands from pollution is that one crime, thousands of murders, or millions of assaults based on different interpretations of the law.
PS: Why are most serial killers in the US white? Is it because they actually kill more people, or because gang violence is not counted.
PPS: I am not sure why so many people are down voting you, it's reasoned argument even if I don't exactly agree.
Not saying the stats are worthless; just biased.
This is at root of most discussions about problems in these areas. And never gets mentioned, instead lots of intellectualizing about what should and shouldn't be.
Personally, it seems like it's the millennials keeping the whole system afloat!
This article is dripping with bias.