Andrew Wiles on the struggle and beauty of mathematics
blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk
blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk
"As Wiles began his lectures, there was more and more speculation
about what it was going to be," Dr. Ribet said.
... Finally, at the end of his third lecture, Dr. Wiles concluded
that he had proved a general case of the Taniyama conjecture.
Then, seemingly as an afterthought,
he noted that that meant that Fermat's last theorem was true. Q.E.D. [1]
And "I had to give the next lecture," Dr. Ribet said.
"It was something incredibly mundane."
Since mathematicians are "a pretty well-behaved
bunch," they listened politely.
But, he said, it was hard to concentrate.
"Most people in the room, including me, were incredibly shell-shocked," [1]
Very funny, but also gives me goosebumps. That would have been some lecture![1] http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/24/us/at-last-shout-of-eureka...
This is an idea I'd dismissed at first, 'work is worship' and all that jazz, as some propaganda by the classes incl. and above the bourgeoisie.
I then the same illustrated by Alan Watts, and illustrated beautifully some months back in Oatmeal.
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/unhappy
... and then I realized both were true. Words are both the instruments of the savior and the devil.
---
1) Saving whatever% off your car insurance makes you X.
2) Having sex makes you X.
3) Scoring the winning point in a close game makes you X.
A) Laying the last brick on a house you built with your bare hands makes you Y.
B) Watching your daughter get her doctorate makes you Y.
C) Solving a non-trivial theorem for the first time in history makes you Y.
---
I'm just not sure what to call X and Y; perhaps "happiness" vs "fulfillment", or "joy" vs "happiness", or "happiness" vs "true happiness"...
OTOH the history of mathematics seems to include the development of notation to hide complexity, so FLT can be written as A = sB
He had the proof for the power of 2, and when he wrote his line he might have had the proof for powers of 3 in mind (which he didnt write down) and thought that that one would generalize for all n. Which turned out to be true, but for completely different reasons.
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem#Fermat...
I guess the incentive to find it is much less now though when the theorem has been proved.