Google clones 37sig: "Borrowing ideas is fair game, but copying an entire app is wrong."
daringfireball.net
daringfireball.net
However, if that was their point, they didn't make it. There are a lot of things that are easy to copy, but hard to design. Copying a page of Shakespeare doesn't prove much about his skills or yours. The work was the thought that went into it, not the physical writing.
So much for the theoretical point; as a practical matter, slavish copying doesn't pay either. All you get is a snapshot of the thing you copied, without the thought behind it.
From the comments of the RWW post about this http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/huddlechat_campfire_rip...
""" As one of the App Engine product managers, I wanted to give an update -- we've now taken HuddleChat down from the App Engine app gallery. The App Engine team was looking for some sample apps to help kick the tires on their new system, so we invited Googlers to build some as side projects. A couple of our colleagues here built HuddleChat in their spare time because they wanted to share work within their team more easily and thought persistent web chat would do the trick. We've heard some complaints from the developer community, though, so rather than divert attention from Google App Engine itself, we thought it better to just take HuddleChat down.
Thanks, Pete Koomen Product Manager, Google App Engine Team """
As an analogy, is it OK to copy a font and call it your own?
Like an email client, it has an obvious design that works.
The point of this platform is to make it easier to write applications. They proved it by cloning the poster child for the last prod-hype-tivity platform, RoR. Life goes on.
irc is alive and well.
Super handy.