There are two different concepts, internet neutrality, and network neutrality.
Network neutrality is "treat bits agnosticly"
Internet neutrality is "treat opinions agnosticly"
Which one "net" neutrality refers to is anyone's guess.
Network neutrality is "treat bits agnosticly"
Internet neutrality is "treat opinions agnosticly"
Which one "net" neutrality refers to is anyone's guess.
Speech can't infringe on someone else's freedom.
Then you can pay more for "unmetered" 10mbps, 100mbps, 1000mbps, 10000mbps, etc...
There's also plans for "minimum + burst" e.g.: 20mbps->200mbps, 50mbps->300mbps, 100mbps->1000mbps, so on and so forth.
I think this is a perfectly acceptable method of billing and I really wish we could just use this. As, in effect, if you pay for the '100mbps->1000mbps,' this translates too... you get 1000mbps at all times you use the internet, but you get 100mbps/mo worth of bandwidth.
That translates to ~8.75TB/mo of bandwidth or,
((100*24*30)/1024)/8
(someone please correct me if I'm very wrong here. I worked at a webhost several years ago and this was basically our pricing model.)