I can't tell if it was a bot, or an overzealous friend.
I hope the dystopian future won't be ruled by those with the best bots/spam.
I can't tell if it was a bot, or an overzealous friend.
I hope the dystopian future won't be ruled by those with the best bots/spam.
Online polls (even with brief responses) are obviously completely meaningless exercises in self-selection bias, but it's going to be weird that probably not all that long in the future - even discussing things on the internet may end up becoming of questionable value. Perhaps that will signal the end of anonymity in discussion. And wouldn't be that be a world - when people can link you to the most idiotic things you've ever stated online, in your entire life. Talk about a chilling effect on discussion.
Seems there was ballot stuffing on both sides.
The current FCC regulatory scheme known as "Title II" represents an unprecedented increase in government control over the internet. Such over-regulation is hurting our economy and suffocating innovation. I support Chairman Pai's plan to return to a commonsense regulatory framework that allows for the internet to grow without useless government interference. The internet has flourished for decades without the heavy hand of government over-regulation. It's time we return to what works.
Obviously, it was sold to this relative as a push against the heavy hand of the government ...
If I had to guess, it was a viral facebook post pro-trump administration that gave boilerplate to paste in.