Why Email Isn't Dead
thestartupdigest.com
thestartupdigest.com
"People say email is dead. No, it's not! In fact, we've got this awesome email newsletter that's just for startup founders, and it's doing super awesome. Long live email!"
Gee that's...convenient.
Obviously email is not dead. But what about email newsletters? People actually still read these?
Apparently they do, since StartupDigest seems to have a successful model built around this, as do a few others. Why/how is it successful? Is the format truly superior to a blog? Is there a reason why email newsletter ONLY is superior to blog + email newsletter (+ RSS + Twitter + Facebook + etc.)?
These are questions which I'd have been interested in hearing the author's perspective on, but this article is nothing more than a bit of hype in response to another bit of hype.
Will definitley expand further upon this in the future and address the questions you have on email.
This argument is missing one huge point: what happens when these people go to work? How many businesses will want internal communications delivered over social networks?
Email, although far from perfect, is a wonderful work tool. It's private, it's asynchronous, it's distributed, it's cheap. I don't see this being replaced by social messaging.
Also there is the argument of how do you get your facebook/twitter DM notifications? Mostly through email. Even all of these social services ask for an email when you sign up and send emails to drive you back to the site.
Facebook is now one of the largest senders of email in the world..
Yeah - the B2B point also valid. "Uh, yeah, I'm just gonna message you this contract on facebook". I don't think so.
I imagine what they really mean to say is that some sort of social identity will replace email as our manifestation of self online. That is to say, we used to default to email as the way we ran our Communications (big "C") as individuals.
"How can I find you online?" Oh, here's my email address.
But are people still identifying themselves that way?
8.3% of online time is spent with email (-28% shrink from last year). 22.7% of online time is spent social networking (+43% growth from last year). [Source: The Nielson Company, June 2010 data]
As we grow to use social accounts - Facebook, Google, Twitter - to sign up for stuff and spend most of our time there, the question is: will there be a psychological shift so that I am not uniquely identified by my email address, but rather by a richer and more controllable social profile?
"How can I find you online?" Oh, look me up on Facebook.
Already, I default to connecting with Not-Quite-Friends by telling them to find me online at my social profiles.
Once I give out my email address, I can never take it back, and everyone gets the same priority ("unread") whether you are my mother or a salesman.
I don't think anyone rationally disputes that email will always - or at least for a very long time - be something we use as a central way to communicate with people we have close relationships with; family, co-workers, anyone we have high frequency contact with.
But the author is - I assume because it's written on StartupDigest - trying to grasp the implications on how startups use these communication channels to reach & engage with customers.
In that respect: watch out, email may very well be dying.
This is true. But you don't have to give out your social network profile for anyone - requested or otherwise - to look you up, message you and potentially find out a whole bunch of stuff about you.
(E.g today I found out - accidently, I was browsing around - that an ex-gf stills live at the address she used to, who her boyfriend is and the fact that they are, I think, about to move house. I am not "friends" with either of them and their public profiles are private.)
Edit: this reminds me of an idea I had a while back: temporary email/contact addresses. Completely anonymous way of allowing people to contact you.
As privacy controls normalize across less sophisticated users, I imagine more people will behave like us geeks. Or not - plenty of average Joe's still sort through 500 spam email every day by hand.
how about a more important question, maybe one with a less obvious answer, like: is hacker news dead?
I have email literally everywhere and email reminders are still easily the most effective notification system for a bunch of things I've seen.
And then I remember the telephone, which 120 years later is still going strong.
with voip and mobile phones are we taking about the same invention? because talking-to-other-people will likely never die. are you calling that the "telephone".
vinyl LP's are not "dead" as in non-existent, 0% adoption, etc, but they are a lot less prevalent than they used to be. cd's too.
what if electronic ink supersedes regular ink in newspapers? is it still "print".
inventions evolve they don't die.