http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Aw3.org+href+...
During the discovery process, just replace "hypertext reference" with whatever you suspect HREF to stand for. The grandparent post is absolutely correct in criticizing these types of blog posts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hyperlink#what_does_href_s...
Trust me. The whole reason the article exists was because there was no clear answer through search/wikipedia/w3c/etc.
You should link to the search that provides the same results. You can even use lmgtfy.com if you're feeling bitchy. I'd say Ryan Tomayko knows how to use Google; did you do any background on him?
By your logic, Wikipedia should just link to searches too; but then it wouldn't be Wikipedia.
4th one down "hypertext reference ..." unless I guessed wrong?
In thinking of "href" as "head reference", you are providing a URI (possibly also a target URL) from your source document -- the tail -- to the intended destination, the head.
I'm unclear what this looks like from the head's perspective. Is the tail/head distinction absolute, or relative and dependent upon the current document's perspective? If absolute, then the tail might be viewed as the link's instantiator.
Ask someone working in hypertext long enough to know what VERONICA stands for -- they'll know what HREF means!
But funny you mention Wikipedia. Looks like it has the answer:
> with the attribute "href" (HREF is an abbreviation for "Hypertext REFerence"[3])
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlink
> [3] Tim Berners-Lee, Making a Server ("HREF" is for "hypertext reference")
It was the top Google result for a question my wife asked me as she was learning html. I learned something from it, so I posted it here.