Err, so I see a defense of the news arm and it's impartiality and acknowledgement that the editorial section has an ax to grind? Is that supposed to be some big expose? That's the point of the editorial department, a chance for reporters to give opinions rather than be impartial.

The sad part is that people might assume it actually supports the position that WaPo can't be trusted. That seems to be the norm these days. Say something and throw out random video or audio as evidence when it isn't anything of the sort, since most people won't pay enough attention to really check and will just assume that if it was presented as evidence, it must be evidence. :/