Short on content, long on medication ads is how I view Time. Time has suffered from the lack of a differentiated digital content strategy that is compelling. I default to WaPo, NYT, Economist, FinTimes, Atlantic and the BBC.
I went to their homepages, both of them had some article on "harry and markle", watchdog suing trump, sexual assault article.
Whats the difference?
PS: just scanning the homepage put me in bad mood, why would ppl voluntarily do this to themselves.
The CFPB official suing Trump is a serious ongoing crisis which is not about personal injury, but rather a dispute about who is legitimate head of a federal agency. It is the literal top story of the Wall Street Journal.
And whatever you might think about the the crisis about changing mores on sexual harassment and assault, it is right now hitting Congress and changing committee chairs, endangering reelections, and may lead to resignations.
how are huffpo headlines not "normal" if they have same headlines.
WaPo headline for CFPB story: Fight over consumer watchdog agency goes on as two acting directors try to take command
HuffPo headline: CIVIL WAR AT FINANCE WATCHDOG!
One is clearly more hysterical than the other. The story content may be roughly the same, but the headline is not. And if the headline is so clickbaity, it's probably not unlikely that the content is more dramatic/hysterical than is necessary too.