Bitcoins aren't backed by anything or to anything. Whether it's worth 1 dollar or a million dollar makes no difference, it's our perception that gives it value. Plus they are limited unlike Fiat currency
To be crude, human poop takes effort to create, but the worth of it as a tradable good is significantly less than the effort involved.
I always posit this question, to which I have never received a satisfactory answer: What, exactly, would the US do if the world suddenly decided that the dollar was worth nothing?
Massive buybacks of dollars by the Fed would be seen as an ineffective and desperate move. Besides that, what other recourse do they have?
Why would the rest of the world decide this? It’d hurt them more than it’d hurt the US or else they’d have done it already.
So, in such a world, I wouldn’t find it so surprising that certain countries would like to wean themselves of the dollar. Of course, this it is more important for powerful geo-political actors like China and Russia, than Somalia (uses USD extensively), and as an example you can look at how China is planning on offering a yuan priced oil contract that is backed by gold.
Economically the US is very well positioned - it has friendly neighbors, a robust legal system, a diversified industry and a lot of natural resources, so it would take quite a bit for hyperinflation to occur. Obviously anything is possible, though.
We've seen 20% inflation before, and I see no reason we can't see it again.
Yes. This is the basis of 20th century American prosperity.
Look up Chiquita bananas on Wikipedia
It's only a slight exaggeration to describe taxes like that. There are huge amounts of assets held under the jurisdiction of the US government (probably somewhere north of $100 trillion[1]) and a huge number of people who live under the jurisdiction of the US government (>300 million). If the owners of those assets or the people living in the US don't pay their tax bills, the government can resort to seizing their property to cover the tax bill or jailing the person who didn't pay. If they don't cooperate with that action, the government can send people with guns to force them to comply. Effectively, everyone who lives in or owns property in the US is forced to acquire dollars to pay their tax bill.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_position_of_the_Unit...
Likewise, US dollars are "legal tender for all debts public and private". If someone (in the US) refuses to accept US dollars to consolidate a US debt, they will be arrested or killed (after several opportunities to course correct) and their property will be forcefully taken.
And for a third example - consider someone trying to set up an unregistered company in the USA. If they get on the government's radar, what do you think their long term prospects are?
Fortunately, our legal system and general social beliefs mean that it rarely if ever would come that far. But the threat of violence is real. And think - without that threat, however far removed, why would anyone pay their taxes or follow most laws?
Why would the world suddenly not want in on that?
When Zimbabwe destroyed its currency the real killer wasn't leaving the printing presses on (it was too late by that point) it was the systematic destruction of its agricultural industry.
If the influx of USD was higher and faster than could be addressed, the economy would naturally get inflation that would force interest rates even higher up (since no banks will lend at a loss, so borrowing costs get pushed up first by the fed, and then by the need to cover for expected inflation). This would be a death blow to many indebted and highly-leveraged businesses that are dependent on low interest rates for operational purposes (including those in the financial sector) and so they would go out of business. The need for the financial system to write-off the debt held by these companies would also eliminate a certain amount of money in circulation. Eventually enough money has been destroyed/absorbed and the economy is back in equilibrium.
On a less than academic note: this is not a totally unlikely scenario since the flight-to-crypto is a de facto process of de-dollarization, with crypto assets essentially replacing fiat both as store of value as well as medium of exchange. Put another way, the increase in the value of cryptocurrencies is really just a loss in the purchasing power of everyone holding fiat, and since these additional assets are now competing to purchase the same pool of goods, what people think of as bubbles in assets like housing are really just reflective of inflation in the underlying supply of money-that-can-buy-things. And it will get worse when you can sell your house for crypto.
People will scoop up all the free dollars, and bring them back to the us where they have value.
Contracts still have to be paid in dollars. Some people around the world would be upset that their dollars are worthless, but it turns out they could sell those dollars to people who need to pay debts in dollars. So suddenly this valueless piece of paper has value again, because you can trade it for things you want.
if you can in an instant impose some irrational condition for an instant, i think the global economy will, certainly shift, but people would notice all of the arbitrage opportunities and things would _generally_ go back to the way they were, like a flash crash.
if you could wave a magic wand, and make people think the dollar is worthless for 10 years? That would be weird. i imagine we'd make a new currency, dollar2 and just pay everyone in that. you could bring in old dollars to the us and exchange them for dollar2's. But because people are under a spell, they can't think of the arbitrage idea. so it only happens accidentally.
As long as there's a base of goods/services that can be bought and are priced in dollars, dollars will continue to have value.
Why would the fed need to buy back dollars?
You might as well ask what would happen if the world suddenly disbelieved in anything else that's just a social construct -- property, authority, family, etc. It's a fun and perhaps enlightening thought experiment, but not much practical use.