With a mix of radiation sources of varying half lifes, it won’t be a 100:1 decrease after 14 hours, but is this, as I guess, just a rough fairly easy to remember fit to some sample curve, or is there some simple mathematical model behind this?
With a mix of radiation sources of varying half lifes, it won’t be a 100:1 decrease after 14 hours, but is this, as I guess, just a rough fairly easy to remember fit to some sample curve, or is there some simple mathematical model behind this?
Most of these isotopes exist on distinct decay chains. An unstable nuclear state may decay in more than one mode, each with a distinct time constant. Many of these decays occur as groups of decay chains that occur on extremely short time-scales, and may temporarily remain in metastable states (isomers).
So this general rule results from the superposition of many thousands of reactions, that proceed stochastically with distinct time constants and energy released.
There is a mathematical rule relating the time constants and energies of these reactions, but it is not simple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%27s_golden_rule
> The danger of radiation from fallout also decreases with time, as radioactivity decays exponentially with time, such that for each factor of seven increase in time, the radiation is reduced by a factor of ten. For example, after 7 hours, the average dose rate is reduced by a factor of ten; after 49 hours, it is reduced by a further factor of ten (to 1/100th); after two weeks the radiation from the fallout will have reduced by a factor of 1000 compared the initial level; and after 14 weeks the average dose rate will have reduced to 1/10,000th of the initial level.