Drilling Reawakens Sleeping Faults in Texas, Leads to Earthquakes
scientificamerican.com
scientificamerican.com
So it's not "drilling" that is at issue, but injecting water for disposal that awaken faults.
So yes it is the drilling that is the problem.
Note: I worked on drill rigs for half a year punching holes to 1.6km.
The point is, drilling sure as shit isn't an exact science, you should probably be more skeptical about its effects than not. Most drillers aren't some highly educated academic that knows exactly whats going on down hole...most of them have been hired because they have the mechanical aptitude to fix just about anything that can go wrong with a rig or have the perseverance to push through the horrible conditions, both above ground and down hole to get the job done. Drilling be it through the process itself or the result of its action definitely plays a role in the problem.
Wastewater injection isn't drilling. That's why the title is mislabled.
> Current Drilling Techniques Reawaken Sleeping Faults in Texas
work? The injection of water is part of how they currently operate, if there are other ways for them to drill then society should decide whether the increased costs are worth it but... how they currently drill is causing this issue.
I think you mean how they "produce". Two completely separate things. There are many production methods. Wells can be drilled in several ways, and several different kinds of production can happen on them.
Sure, the small quakes likely are relieving bigger ones tens of thousands of years hence, so we don't care about that.
The rules would be, you want to drill and re-inject to make some money, make sure it's profitable enough that you can pay into an EQ indemnification fund. Actuaries would set rates.
Science funded by middle eastern princes trying to stop their competition with manufactured environmental outrage?
Source: I ran a site for a while where people posted images and stories of how natural gas drilling had ruined their lives or caused environmental harm. We would try to get as much info from people as we could before they signed the NDAs for the settlement money and never talked about it again
I can’t imagine why someone would downvote factual information that adds to the discussion. The downvote option wasn’t added so people could hide comments they disagree with. I’ve personally met dozens of people who’ve signed NDAs with natural gas companies but live in denial if you insist.
Further downvotes likely because your tone is defensive and you throw around wild accusations.
In other words, you presented weak evidence then violated community norms in responding.
However, I would love to check out your site, to see if there's useful information regarding this thread on it. Can you share a URL?
Below the surface, the earthquakes and changes in pressure from adding and removing fluids/gas from the ground often cause the aquifer water to mix with the fracking fluids or shale gas causing it to be unusable.
The reality is that quakes are treated by the anti-drilling lobby as a proof of "me am play gods"[1]. A sign from above/below that we're angered mother earth. I think the more sober minded should realize that the important numbers when talking about "consequences" is not how angry mother earth is, but the quakes' cost in terms of damage and human lives.
The roads in most of the fracking areas are terrible and its often hard to pinpoint whether damage was caused by heavy fracking trucks simply driving on these small roads frequently versus seismic activity versus something else. That doesn’t mean there isn’t damage, it’s just difficult to account for and externalized.
More significantly, there are major changes inside the earth that occur. If you pump a bunch of poisonous fracking fluids into the ground and then drill out a bunch of shale, you’ve replaced a solid layer of shale with fracking fluids and air. Naturally things can mix more since there isn’t a tough layer of shale. The shale is normally pretty close to the aquifer layer which means you now have seismic activity mixing your fracking fluids and shale remnants with your drinking water. Just because the layman may not immediately see the consequences, doesn’t mean they aren’t there. And in most of the big fracking areas there are enough houses without drinkable water that people know something bad is happening even if they can’t pinpoint the exact mechanism. If you drive around those areas, you’ll notice many houses with what are known as water buffalo tanks outside to provide their house with drinkable water. Typically the gas company pays for these because the families in the area have threatened lawsuits or other action after their houses lost drinkable water.
Part of the problem is the Obama-era EPA did not allow companies to write off dry-holes, leading to a shortage of wells that can be used for salt-water injection. This put a stress on the existing injection infrastructure.
https://np.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/31wo57/the_chevro...
compare the techniques mentioned with OP's comment
One follows the other.