Hacker News Reader

Comment by celticninja | Hacker News Reader

Negotiating a fair free trade deal is harder for a smaller market who every one knows are in need of a trade deal.

On the contrary, the opportunity to access the UK market has much enthusiasm.

It certainly does. A country reeling in economic shock, suddenly cut off from the free trade it enjoyed with 300 million other people? They will take trade deals that previously they wouldn't have given the time of day to.

Thats a bit hyperbolic. It's not like trade with the EU will suddenly stop. Worst case will be WTO tariffs , most of which will already be offset by the fall in the pound.

Yeah, but definitely not if you're importing into UK.

They(US, Japan, China) would like a deal with the UK because it would be easier for them to obtain more preferential terms than if they were negotiating with the EU. The EU is a much bigger market than the UK alone, Australia which made some noises about a free trade deal with the UK don't want to actually make a deal, or even discuss it, until they have their EU deal sewn up. The reality is we lost a lot of negotiating power through brexit and put ourselves in a position where we need trade deals and all our trading partners know that we need those deals. It's a poor position from which to negotiate.

> On the contrary, the opportunity to access the UK market has much enthusiasm.

You're implying that's some kind of great news. I'd say, real estate investors have lots of enthusiasm for sellers threatened with foreclosure. You can frame it as positively as you want but at the end of the day the UK's position at the negotiation table is simply weaker, and it's no surprise everyone suddenly wants to talk.

> I'd say, real estate investors have lots of enthusiasm for sellers threatened with foreclosure.

Nice, hehe :)

While that's definitely nice... there is the possibility that making a disadvantages agreement with the US, China, Canada, etc. is better in the long term.

It took years for the EU and Canada to reach an agreement. If one of them was in a less advantages position maybe it could be done faster... And maybe speed is more important than conditions of the agreement, who really knows?

EDIT: okay, the brits perhaps ought to know what disadvantages trade agreements can do... given their past experience making them with their colonies :)

I note that the brexit'ers probably didn't want disadvantages trade agreements :)

In particular, the prospect of access to the UK market on China/US/Japan's terms is cause for much enthusiasm.

With the EU, all members have to agree and that means the interests of 28 countries are going to be at play vs one country (unless agreement with another trading block). This means that many EU trade deals won't be as favourable for any single country, more so with some than others due to the amount of compromises.

This does not even factor in tariffs that are in play to protect industries that some members have no interest in and as such negatively impact them.

It's like trying to agreeing a meal that everybody will eat between two people over agreeing a meal of nearly 30 people, and comparing steak with gluten free bread in some cases.

Remember trade deal can encompass everything or area's of trade/industry. That is when having just two parties becomes a positive.

Still, volume always helps, but more than enough upsides to offset that.

But this takes time, luckily much easier without everybody elses interests coming into play, as you have with trade blocks that have many members to all appease. Just look at how one vote against in the UN can kill of any moving forward and see how that can work out and you will start to see that volume at that price, is not as idyllic as it seems for trade deals.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com