Where Brexit Hurts: The European Nurses and Doctors Leaving London
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
If ending the ponzi scheme and paying enough to attract British workers means we have to get a bit poorer, so be it, I am happy to do so to hold the forces of globalism at bay just a short while longer. I like diversity, and I want it to remain - how dull and disappointing it would be to live in a world where every country is made up of the same undifferentiated global populace and culture.
Or we just continue the ponzi by attracting more workers from outside the EU, e.g. Commonwealth countries, with which the UK has strong historic ties - we just get to choose the highly skilled and temporary labour we want, rather than having no choice over who comes, as is the case whilst the UK remains in the EU.
Real life example: I phoned once when a friend of mine thought he was having a heart attack. Some of the questions were pertinent, some not (such as: could your friend be pregnant?).
After 10 minutes it was decided he wasn't having a heart attack and should make an appointment to see his GP.
I believe it is possible to escalate the call to a medical professional if you know the system.
Ten minutes is far too long. If someone thinks they are having a heart attack this should set a red flag for immediate professional attention?
Having a professional always dealing with these calls would be the ideal but, I guess, you get back to the shortage of qualified staff problem.
Also, maybe, making access easier will also encourage people to use the service more often - maybe for trivial issues too. So you end up making things even worse?
I am 52 and when I was a child my parents could call our doctor at any time, even if he was at home in the middle of the night. He would come out straight away, no question. The assumption was if you had taken the trouble to call it must be serious. Often it wasn't but with children you can't take chances.