The US military has boot camp to psychologically break its trainees down and build them back up closer to ideal (not to mention the inherent impressionability of youth). Furthermore, it leverages painfully binding enlistment terms and the UCMJ hammer. Civilians who work for the US military aren't beholden to any of this, and they also have the unique difficulty of culling incompatibly after a civilian in competitive service has gotten past a brief probationary period, let alone if a union is involved; observe the author suggests removing the individual from the team (i.e. not firing) and approaching the lead's supervisor as a last resort...this is not coincidence.
The categorical feel good smoke blowing that brass are so aptly known for leaves a lingering odor that can be smelled from a mile away by competent individuals. Comparatively speaking, military leadership is a cake walk, and even the uninspirational get a PCS reset every few years.
Already under-compensated, civilians with STEM backgrounds tend not to play the insignificant cog game, and surely not when a team lead barks I this, that, or the other.