The TED talks empire has been grappling with sexual harassment
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
It purports that Henry Adams wasn't so off the mark when he proclaimed that power is "a sort of tumor that ends by killing the victim’s sympathies." The breakout quote here:
"Subjects under the influence of power, [Dacher Keltner, a psychology professor at UC Berkeley] found in studies spanning two decades, acted as if they had suffered a traumatic brain injury—becoming more impulsive, less risk-aware, and, crucially, less adept at seeing things from other people’s point of view."
The high profile cases surrounding sexual abuse recently seem to indicate that the problem is systemic. It represents an illness of society, humanity, or a factor of both that we can only insulate against by understanding the root of what is causing the issue and how to work against it. It's not as simple as: Louis CK, Kevin Spacey, Harvey Weinstein and crew are evil.
Is that accurate or is it the opposite? It seems to me that much of this behavior is the animalistic mating strategies of males. Thus society is discouraging this behavior..
Strangely, while males harassing females is strongly discouraged, in western (as apposed to say Islam) female preening behavior which is basically the female equivalent of "sexual harassment" is perfectly acceptable.
Wikipedia defines sexual harassment as "Sexual harassment is bullying or coercion of a sexual nature, or the unwelcome or inappropriate promise of rewards in exchange for sexual favors." [1] This is an ironic definition to me as a male. The times I have felt sexually harassed were when I felt that a woman asked for a reward in a sexual way, for example, asking for help using sexualized mannerisms, voice, body-movements. Exactly the opposite dynamic to the sexual harassment defined by wikipedia.
2. where lines should be drawn in society is very political. Sexual harassment lines are no different.
3. Washington-post is a political news org