Hacker News Reader

Comment by PinguTS | Hacker News Reader

The iPhoneX has the strongest glass.

… but actually breaks easier than the iPhone 8 glass.

Are you sure? I saw a YouTube drop test video and the iPhone X survived multiple drops from head height (~66") onto concrete without breaking, but the iPhone 8 shattered.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vHCBwJVeO4

I've dropped my case-less iPhone X 5 feet onto bathroom tile and not even a noticeable scratch afterwards.

Not at all scientifically done.

https://www.test.de/Apple-iPhone-X-Das-zerbrechlichste-iPhon...

(German Consumer report: iPhone X is most brittle of all iPhones)

It looks like they dropped a single phone, and you didn't even get to see how it fell. Hard to say that's definitive.

I think that's because you have multiple factors with thin smartphone glass. The harder it gets, the more brittle it becomes. You probably won't be able to cut into it even with a pretty sharp knife, but if you were to drop it at the right angle it'd shard into a billion tiny pieces.

I have no idea how automotive glass differs, but I imagine the difference in weight and thickness requirements does impact things a lot.

This reminds me of the unfolding problem of sun roof explosions.

the iPhone 8 and iPhone X use the same glass

Maybe it's not the glass but the frame and components. Maybe the notch can pressure the glass when stress occurs ..

lets not compare iphonex to Elon Musk's glass. I know nothing about glass, but, I trust the guy with a company called spaceX on his portfolio to make my glass right.

It's this kind of ridiculous bootlicking that makes me dislike the Musk cult with a passion.

It's not bootlicking. It's just common sense when you factor in cost, thickness and experience with durability. You know, re-entering the atmosphere and not burning up. I don't trust apple's marketing about iphone durability because I have broken several. This is a new product, and already you're comparing it to a smartphone that costs $1,000 and $250 to manufacture? The iphone: 1. lower price point than the truck 2. has to be slim, and lightweight. Many restrictions.

the semi: 1. costs much more than an iphone, which we're to assume accounts for the expensive windshield. 2. the windshield can be as thick as your attitude.

Bow before your your betters, prole. Also, be sure to protest Thanksgiving and Columbus Day as racist by working - nothing says antiestablishment like free labor.

If it is sarcasm I don't understand it.

It’s glass - it’a not pixie dust doped adamantium.

Metals arent particularly strong. Glass, plastics, etc are all stronger (yield strength). But boy are they ductile, and very tough. Iron can take, literally, an infinite number of loading cycle.

You can make ceramics, glass, etc better but the overall performance package of iron is very hard to beat.

If I were to dismiss SpaceX as 1950s technology with modern electronics and engine technology the soviets mastered in the 60s would you be annoyed?

So why dismiss the truck manufacturing industry? Semis are very thought out solutions for their domain.

My problem was comparing the iphone that has a $1,000 price point to the new glass of the semi. I'm not comparing anything to truck manufacturing industry. I presume that that it also costs more than an iPhone. So what's your point?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com